“The OLC argues that the presidential order, issued without authorization by or consultation with Congress, was nevertheless lawful because the president ‘had reasonably determined that the use of force would be in the national interest and that the anticipated hostilities would not rise to the level of a war in the constitutional sense.'”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Political Shifts in Bavaria Could Have Wide Repercussions
David Cameron's plans to ban online encryption dubbed 'infeasible'
Private prisons contribute thousands to Oklahoma political campaigns
Plan to merge Canada and the United States has many, many problems
Oklahoma state legislator introduces bill to banish NSA
China central bank suggests faster tempo for freeing yuan
Valet-parked cars at airport searched under TSA regulations
In trial over OKC bombing evidence, FBI accused of threatening witness
Rosatom to sue AtomMoney for crypto-currency mining
Officials: 80 Percent Of Recent NYC High School Graduates Cannot Read
FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades; 14 prisoners already dead
John Kerry gives Syria week to hand over chemical weapons or face attack
Federal appeals court rejects Texas, Wyoming challenge to EPA 'greenhouse gas' regulations
Authorization for Use of Military Force: a blank check for war without end
Prosecutors: 'Anarchist' group of U.S. soldiers aimed to overthrow government