
“The OLC argues that the presidential order, issued without authorization by or consultation with Congress, was nevertheless lawful because the president ‘had reasonably determined that the use of force would be in the national interest and that the anticipated hostilities would not rise to the level of a war in the constitutional sense.'”
Related posts:
Iranian dairy company unveils five-ton ice cream tub to break world record
New Yorkers Trying to Flee Find Moving Isn’t So Easy
FBI to tear down its headquarters; no plans to sow salt in earth at site
Human Rights Watch: Kuwait using ‘excessive force’ against protesters
Bank of Montreal CEO: Bank is open to Bitcoin, conditionally
Marc Faber vs. Jim Rogers Conversation - CNBC 10/4/2012
Central banks becoming major investors in stock markets
Tesla's Elon Musk Is No Dummy
Federal appeals court rules bin Laden death photos can remain classified
Fast-food worker wage protests spread to Detroit and St. Louis
Another Chinese Firm Defaults on Its Dollar Bond
Charge three officers in squad car asphyxiation death of suspect, jury recommends
ECB's Celebration of Its New $1.4 Billion Tower Is Spoiled by Protesters
Former cricket captain turned politician Imran Khan detained and ‘interrogated over drone views’ by ...
Coal to Fill China's Nuclear Gap