“The OLC argues that the presidential order, issued without authorization by or consultation with Congress, was nevertheless lawful because the president ‘had reasonably determined that the use of force would be in the national interest and that the anticipated hostilities would not rise to the level of a war in the constitutional sense.'”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
U.S. developed ‘tsunami bomb’ during World War II
Retaliatory Tariffs Push Harley Offshore; Enraged Trump Threatens Punitive Taxes
In a Tough Job Market, Who’s Employed and Who's Not
Holiday in Thailand could end for expats
Mass protest in Japan against U.S. hybrid aircraft
Russia to ban US from using Space Station over Ukraine sanctions
St. Paul to pay $50K to man who claimed police assaulted him
RBS has lost all the £46bn pumped in by the taxpayer
Gold Price Oscillator (Year over Year Price Change %)
Gold Mining Deals Seen Rebounding on Price Discount
Thomson Reuters to Suspend Early Peeks at Key Index
David Stockman: Banks Too big to Fail, Another Bubble
Gun rights advocates stand armed outside bagel shop to educate public
U.S. pushing Gulf nations to develop missile defense
Japan's debt-funding costs to hit $257 billion next year