“For the USA, its ambitions have a new locus in Africa. These wars, as in Libya and Mali, have not been joined by this trio of imperialists because of terrorism threatening Europe or the U.S. This is, for one thing, about controlling African governments and enabling the extraction of wealth from resources in this region of Africa. It was Gaddafi’s (Libya’s) sympathy and outreach toward these regions and peoples that helped bring about his downfall. He stood in the way of western business interests, and his ideas for controlling the resources for Africans could not be abided by the western business interests and their allies in government.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/130946.html
(Visited 30 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Criminals do not need guns
Can the Internet Tax Be Stopped Just Like the Attack On Syria?
Can America Win A War In Syria?
Obama On Football
Why Are Bond Yields Falling as Stocks Rally?
How, Exactly, Does A Travel Ban Keep Us Safe?
Bill Bonner: Ike’s Warning
Fury at the American Raj
The Guns of Zagreb
Severe Disaffection: Seventy-five Percent of US Citizens Don't Trust Government
Is ‘Peak Auto’ the Latest Threat to the Markets?
The Economist Hoists Its Battle Balloon?
Precious Metals Power Summit 2013
Jacob Hornberger: Keep It Shut Down!
A War On Opioids Is A War On Suffering People