
“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that human rights groups do not have standing to sue the government over its warrantless wiretapping program because they have no proof that the wiretapping has harmed them. The vote was split 5-4 along partisan lines, with the conservative majority supporting the Obama administration’s argument that the FISA Amendments Act was above reproach in this case because the harms were ‘speculative,’ and not ‘actual.’ Roving, warrantless wiretaps were authorized by President George W. Bush after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, turning the National Security Agency into the nation’s spy machine.”
Related posts:
Cyprus vs Bankocracy: 'Mattress better place to keep cash than banks'
Luxury Berlin Apartment bought with Bitcoin
California: Laws That Are 'Impossible' to Follow Can Still Be Constitutional
New N.C. GOP congressman endorses going to war with Mexico
Minnesota City Settles After Cop Uses Mace On Deaf Motorist
What You Need To Know About The Liberator 3D-Printed Pistol
September 5th: Jury Rights Day
Riot Alert: Look Out Argentina, South Africa, Turkey and India
Philly Judge Who Found Cop Not Guilty, Married to Cop
State Dept. whistleblower’s lawyers targeted by ‘Watergate-style’ break-ins
Boy Claims Cop Sexually Abused Him for Months
Italy's ex-intelligence chief given 10-year sentence for role in CIA kidnapping
Square Fined $507K In Florida For Operating Without A Money Transmitter License
Close the Loophole Legalizing Union Violence
Soaring Interest Rates