“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that human rights groups do not have standing to sue the government over its warrantless wiretapping program because they have no proof that the wiretapping has harmed them. The vote was split 5-4 along partisan lines, with the conservative majority supporting the Obama administration’s argument that the FISA Amendments Act was above reproach in this case because the harms were ‘speculative,’ and not ‘actual.’ Roving, warrantless wiretaps were authorized by President George W. Bush after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, turning the National Security Agency into the nation’s spy machine.”
Related posts:
Jim Rogers: 50% Correction in Markets not Uncommon
The FBI Seized All of TorMail's Data and Is Using It to Catch Hackers
Bitcoin Becomes a Real Job and Wall Street Is Hiring
Atlanta Pursues Scorched Earth Policy Against Street Vendors, Loses
Ben Swann Full Disclosure: Al Qaeda in Syria, the Story You Haven't Heard?
Pot Will Revive Small-Town America
As Bitcoin became popular, these countries became suspicious
5 Absurd Copyright Takedowns That Make The Law Look Outdated
Cancer Patient Loses Doctor, Treatment Delayed Due To ObamaCare
Obama on Zimmerman verdict: Trayvon Martin ‘could have been me 35 years ago’
DEA Says Pot Prohibition Protects Dogs; Cop-Killed Dogs Disagree
Insurance Premiums Surging as Obamacare Kicks In
Audio catches cops shouting ‘Burn this motherf*cker!’ during Dorner siege
Insider Pippa Malmgren Explains How the Bankster Game Really Works
SatoshiDice Sold for $12.4 Million