
“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that human rights groups do not have standing to sue the government over its warrantless wiretapping program because they have no proof that the wiretapping has harmed them. The vote was split 5-4 along partisan lines, with the conservative majority supporting the Obama administration’s argument that the FISA Amendments Act was above reproach in this case because the harms were ‘speculative,’ and not ‘actual.’ Roving, warrantless wiretaps were authorized by President George W. Bush after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, turning the National Security Agency into the nation’s spy machine.”
Related posts:
Pittsburgh airport to host fracking sites starting this month
Helmut Kohl: 'I acted like a dictator to bring in the euro'
Blowback: How U.S. Drones, Coups, and Invasions Create More Violence
Idaho lawmaker’s bill forces students to pass ‘Atlas Shrugged’ test to graduate
UN official tells US to stop drone strikes
Is Puerto Rico Really the Perfect Tax Haven?
GOP tax plan hides 'bubble tax' on high incomes
Obamacare is About to Get More Personal
US covertly built Twitter-like service to stir anti-Castro dissent
Is Japan's Devaluation an Attack on China?
SPLC "field guide" errors prompt lawsuits against tech companies it partners with
Zero Tolerance Watch: Teen Faces Felony Charges for Science Experiment
Disarm the People, Unleash the Drones: The Feinstein Agenda
Private Plane Pilots Face Warrantless Drug Searches
Did Donald Trump Change His Mind on Domestic Spying?