
“The US Supreme Court heard argument Tuesday in a case testing whether government officials can routinely collect a person’s DNA at the time he or she is arrested and then use that DNA sample to try to link the individual to unsolved crimes. At issue in the case is whether taking a DNA sample from an arrestee without first obtaining a court-authorized warrant is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. DNA material contains a plethora of highly personal information bound within a person’s genetic code. DNA might someday reveal information about an individual’s susceptibility to future diseases and perhaps even personality traits.”
Related posts:
Companies turning again to stock buybacks to reward shareholders
Zelle, the Banks’ Answer to Venmo, Proves Vulnerable to Fraud
IMF sees no end to French jobless crisis this decade
With Eye On China, Japan Weighs Raising Military Spending
Attorney General & DOJ to Investigate Officer in Beating Video
Officers on college campus begin carrying 'assault rifles'
Supreme Court rules city councils can't arrest people they disagree with
Self-styled ‘hillbilly’ is ‘pissed at Uncle Sam’ for taking 29% of his $225 million lottery jackpot
The Army's secret Cold War experiments on St. Louisans
Mexico’s Zetas drug cartel strikes gold in the coal business
Police Bullets Hit Bystanders, and Questions Rise Yet Again
Greece passes more spending cuts, tax hikes after third EU bailout
Google, Facebook and Yahoo push 21 nations for surveillance data
Yosemite fire prompts state of emergency in San Francisco
Richest 400 Americans get richer