“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
Ride-sharing companies like Uber may lose ‘bandit cab’ stigma in California
Why might you be denied entry to the US?
Obama order urges companies to share cybersecurity information
EBay considering accepting bitcoin as payment
‘Green-on-blue’ attacks spike in Afghanistan
Sugar 'could be addictive'; UK health czar urges 20% tax
Democratic establishment unmasked: prime defenders of NSA bulk spying
$1 Million Bail For Bitcoin Execs Charged With Money Laundering
Hedge Funds Suffer First Quarterly Net Outflows in 4 Years
Gun Owners Promote Open Carry With Demonstration In Fort Smith
Snowden’s surveillance leaks open way for challenges to programs’ constitutionality
New Gold Import Tax In Sri Lanka
Federal Reserve likely to end QE stimulus program in October
A Secret Deal Between The DEA And Mexico's Sinaloa Drug Cartel?
How Putin Uses Money Laundering Charges to Control His Opponents