“Tea partiers and Green Partiers, liberal Californians and conservative Texans have argued that the meters can cause health problems, or can be hacked, or give utilities too much information about customers’ daily lives, or can overheat and cause fires, or underdeliver on financial benefits. The attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan have said in the past few years that smart-meter plans in their states do not clearly benefit consumers, given the multimillion-dollar installation costs. BGE, which began installing smart meters last year and expects to finish in 2014, will have to ask for reimbursement of the $282 million not covered by a federal grant.”
Related posts:
Civil-liberties groups seek hearings on DEA's use of intelligence
EU to help dairy sector hit by Russian food import ban
S&P: Britain's euroscepticism a major factor in EU's loss of triple-A rating
Swiss Parliament Rejects Gold Standard Initiative Pending Popular Vote
Mayor Bloomberg bankrolls $12 million gun control ad campaign
Portugal banking crisis sends tremors through Europe
Egypt protests galvanized by video of police beating naked man
The Middle East, explained in one (sort of terrifying) chart
You can now spend bitcoins at your local mall
If You Want To Know Why Things Are Falling Apart, Look at Total Debt
Taiwan central bank 'keeping close tabs' on Bitcoin
Indianapolis police Officer David Butler gets 8-year sentence on robbery, official misconduct charge
Watchdog: U.S. postal service in desperate need of rescue from Congress
Pueblo County sheriff's deputy sent to trial on rape and kidnapping charges
Airbnb loses thousands of hosts in SF as registration rules kick in