“Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who filibustered for 13 hours in March 2013 against the idea of using military drone technology against U.S. citizens, said he supported them being used against criminal suspects in an interview with Fox Business Channel on Monday. ‘I have never argued against any technology being used against having an imminent threat, [or] an act of crime going on,’ Paul said, referring to Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. ‘If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.'”
Related posts:
More staged police body cams lead to 43 more dropped Baltimore cases
ICE and Border Patrol May Be Trump's Worst Legacy
Countries Attacked By Bombing, Sabotage or Assisted Coup Since WWII
Gallup Poll Finds 58% of Americans Support Legalizing Marijuana
Georgia sues legal rebel for posting state’s copyrighted law summaries
72 Types Of Americans Government Considers “Potential Terrorists” [2013]
Reality Check: VP Biden, "No law abiding citizens fears 2nd amendment infringement".
Leaked Sony ad for QX10 and QX100 lens cameras
Bitcoin, gold and competitive currencies
Russian nuclear weapons engineers used supercomputer to mine cryptocurrency
The Expendables: The Temps Who Power Corporate Giants
Daddy Bloomberg Wants to Require Retailers to Hide Tobacco
The Little Known Law That Lets Hospitals Shut Down Competition
So It Begins: Congress to Cut Pension Plans
Fantasy Land Financial Analysis for Investors