“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Europe ensures second-class experience for Web users as GDPR takes effect
Bad cyber security bill CISPA heading back to the House
Debian founder allegedly suicides following brutal altercation with SFPD
Interpol proposes new solution to shootings, terrorism: ‘Arm civilians’
Getting Up-to-date on Syria
Introducing Islamic Financial Futurist David Cameron!
Hunger for bitcoin grows in Scandinavia as regulatory approach evolves
Investors Are Plowing Into European Bitcoin Firms
Governments Hate Bitcoin and Cash Because They Protect People’s Privacy
Oklahoma man faces life in prison for selling legal Colorado marijuana
Washing Machine Tariffs Will Hurt Americans
Green Cab v. City of Bowling Green
Iraq post-war life overshadowed by crumbling infrastructure, corruption, poverty
Taper Is Coming. Stock Market Rises.
Scientists invent contact lenses that bestow telescopic vision