“Georgia claims that a legal rebel, Public.Resource.org, is publishing and making it easy for others to copy the physical text and accompanying annotations of Georgia’s state law—the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. The state’s Code Revision Commission maintains that PublicResource.org is not entitled to reproduce the annotated version of Georgia’s code. Annotations are summaries of the law’s meaning and those summaries are contracted to a third party to write. So what Georgia is essentially saying is it is not OK to copy and distribute the texts of the state’s laws if those texts are accompanied with the state-owned summaries of what the law actually means.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Chicago’s Sky-High Tobacco Tax Creates a Huge Black Market
Capital Punishment for Traffic Violations
New exploit leaves most Macs vulnerable to permanent backdooring
I Spent Two Hours Talking With NSA’s Big Wigs. What’s Got Them Mad?
Lew Rockwell: The First 30 Years of the Mises Institute, and the Future
Thousands of Google employees threaten to quit over military drone AI project
ACLU security expert: post-9/11 security measures show ‘we took a wrong turn’
Italy bank runs: the 'Northern Rock' signal of global financial meltdown?
New Hampshire police Taser Chinese woman who tried to buy too many iPhones
Americans and South Koreans Want Peace. Will Trump Listen?
The richest man in Asia is selling everything in China
Is Virgin Galactic ready for powered flight?
Internet Sales Tax Passes the Senate, 69 to 27
Google, Yahoo, and Facebook Are Scrambling: “We Never Cooperated with the NSA!”
Bitcoin Trading Notes: Market Momentum and Spread Trading