“In the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Griswold vs. Connecticut, the justices discovered a ‘right to marital privacy’ in the Constitution. The same right-to-privacy argument has long been used to justify legalized abortion. Griswold vs. Connecticut cited the Third Amendment to say that in today’s world, that Amendment means that ‘individual homes should be free from agents of the state.’ So when all those New England ‘progressives’ cheer the cops, SWAT teams, and military thugs who broke into their homes, pushed them around, ordered them out, and trampled all over them, they are repudiating what defines one as a ‘progressive’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/136457.html
Related posts:
5 Chinese Ghost Cities That Came Alive
TSA Goon Caught Stealing iPad By ABC News; Blames His Wife
The First Amendment Transcends the 'Law'
In Switzerland, Marijuana Use Helps Keep Prisons Calm and Safe
Italy to invest $2bn in Iran projects as Tehran gets back to business
Uh Oh: "US is Deeply Concerned About Developments in the Ukraine"
Debate On Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Bill Continues
Breaking the NSA Spy Ring: “What Rule of Law” Would Look Like
Millions of high-security crypto keys crippled by newly discovered flaw
Arizona legislators authorize gold and silver as legal tender, again
Pentagon to deploy huge blimps over Washington, DC for 360-degree surveillance
The Colorado Shooter Was on Psycho Drugs
Burner Phone - A Simple and Anonymous Disposable Cell Phone
The 21 Places Snowden Has Sent Asylum Requests
Mark Thornton exclusive RT TV interview on Bitcoin