“One of the arguments in favor of mass surveillance as presented in this video is that it is ‘legal.’ But the kinds of legalities being enshrined into law in this modern era are nothing like the natural law that was supposed to be the foundation of Western jurisprudence. The idea that a community would easily or logically adopt an ordinance that mandated that all inhabitants share every single communication with an overriding authority responsible for their ‘safety’ is a doubtful argument to make, in our view. Thus, it is not ‘natural’ – and bound to cause more problems than it solves in the end.”
Related posts:
"The US is bankrupt...and it's only going to get worse from here!"
Chase Bank Limits Cash Withdrawals, Bans International Wire Transfers
Australia: Another Toll Road Goes Bankrupt
Former SWIFT Insider on Financial Warfare, the Dollar, and Bitcoin
IRS Tyranny Against Swiss Bankers Halted By Federal Juries
When Killer Cops Get a Pass, There Are Consequences
17 Dead, More than 200 Injured As Morsi Supporters Rally To Reject 'Coup'
The USS Liberty, Israel & President Johnson’s Order to Destroy the USS Liberty
The Millions Killed in America’s Post-9/11 Wars – Part One: Iraq
Small Utah ISP firm stands up to ‘surveillance state’ as corporations cower
Google's New Phone Service Bridges Cell and Wi-Fi Gaps
For Police, Murder is a Time-Saving Device
German Finance Ministry recognizes bitcoin as currency
Man fires marijuana-wrapped arrow at Washington jail, says he was squirrel hunting
UN Claims Uruguay Not Allowed to End Marijuana Prohibition
