“One of the arguments in favor of mass surveillance as presented in this video is that it is ‘legal.’ But the kinds of legalities being enshrined into law in this modern era are nothing like the natural law that was supposed to be the foundation of Western jurisprudence. The idea that a community would easily or logically adopt an ordinance that mandated that all inhabitants share every single communication with an overriding authority responsible for their ‘safety’ is a doubtful argument to make, in our view. Thus, it is not ‘natural’ – and bound to cause more problems than it solves in the end.”
Related posts:
A Retirement Community for Drug-sniffing Dogs
Manchester Bomber Was Product of West's Libya/Syria Intervention
U.S. court grants Nigerian asylum-seeker the right to testify about his own torture
Nigel Farage: There is a Gathering Electoral Storm
A Sure-Fire Way to Control the Price of Bitcoin?
Philadelphia Eagles Player Photographed Peeing on IRS Sign
European Central Bankers Promise Monetary Inflation for Years
Karen DeCoster Discusses Anarcho-Detroit
Governor Moonbeam and Cronies at Work in California
Penning the Sheep for a Shearing—Capital Controls, Part 2
Dear police: The world is watching when you kill our children
Is Virgin Galactic ready for powered flight?
Outside the United States is Terrifying! (According to the Government)
First Obamacare Horror Story
The Great Super Fantastic Bank of Cyprus & Its Awards of Excellence