“As with other recent court decisions involving the Fourth Amendment’s ‘right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,’ the justices split in an unusual fashion. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the majority’s attempts to justify the use of DNA as an identification tool ‘taxes the credulity of the credulous.’ He added, ‘Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.'”
Related posts:
Former Pittsburgh schools police officer faces sex charges
Police Shoot Woman Dead After She Called 911 to Report an Assault
Life on Mars to become a reality in 2023 according to Dutch firm
Half of Affordable Care Act call center jobs will be part-time
Washington ‘Pot Czar’ Mark Kleiman Packs Up
Switzerland marijuana decriminalization begins October 1st
The Bacteria Babies Need
Canada plans to use hexacopter drones in war against geese
TSA bomb-sniffing dog bites woman at Hartsfield-Jackson
Church of England declares war on payday loans firm
Refugees detail widespread abuse at Australian asylum camp
Snowden, in exchanges with Post reporter, made clear he knew risks
89% of Venetians vote to secede from Italy, form independent state
Bailout Banks Made Riskier Loans: Study [2011]
Marc Faber: S&P 500 Could Fall 20% to 30%