
“As with other recent court decisions involving the Fourth Amendment’s ‘right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,’ the justices split in an unusual fashion. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the majority’s attempts to justify the use of DNA as an identification tool ‘taxes the credulity of the credulous.’ He added, ‘Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.'”
Related posts:
C.I.A. Collecting Data on International Money Transfers, Officials Say
Most Americans think US should 'mind its own business' abroad
United Nations says changing U.S. marijuana laws violate international drug conventions
Deputy Reprimanded After Threat To Bash Citizen's Skull And Feed Him To Alligators Caught On Video
Copper wire stolen from Sea-Tac runway lighting system
Here Is What Bitcoin Users Are Buying On Overstock.com
German tax officials raid UBS clients' homes
Meet Tian Yu: The woman who nearly killed herself making your iPad
WARNING: You are about to be Exposed to "Washington Monument Syndrome"
Unions: Obamacare Will ‘Destroy The Very Health and Wellbeing’ of Workers
Indian gems, jewellery exports fall 41% in June on gold shortage
Cops Use Injured Animals For Target Practice
White House insists NSA surveillance review will be independent
Ageing population pushes welfare bill to crisis point
The ‘Cheapest’ Country in the World