
“The Cuban embargo demonstrated one of the core principles of the national-security state: that the end, which was the preservation of ‘national security,’ justified whatever means were necessary to achieve it. If national security required the government to inflict great suffering on the Cuban people, then that’s just what would have to be done. Nothing could be permitted to stand in the way of protecting national security, whatever that term meant. What mattered was that the national-security establishment — i.e., the military and the CIA — knew what national security meant and had the ultimate responsibility for protecting it.”
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1205a.asp
Related posts:
How to escape from a car underwater
My History With the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC)
By the Numbers: Does Immigration Cause Crime?
The State of Cryptocurrency Mining
How an Online Business Can Help You Internationalize
Iraq back at the brink
David Galland: The Age of Entitlement
Thaddeus Russell: 'A Renegade History of the United States'
All Eyes on Europe This Summer
Jeffrey Tucker: Police Work Has Become a Racket
Abraham Lincoln and the Federal Reserve System: A Forgotten Connection
Will Warrants for Searches Become a Thing of the Past?
The Secret’s Out: Now Is the Time for International Diversification
Free Money for Everyone
The Dark Side of Technology