
“We know we’re secure in our ‘persons, houses, papers, and effects’ unless the cops demonstrate probable cause to a judge and get a warrant. Except… Except when they don’t. The fact of the matter is that police have a lot of leeway to bust your door down and take a look around if they fear that waiting for a warrant could lead to loss of evidence or danger to people. Or lead to something, anyway. That end run around the Fourth Amendment is called ‘exigent circumstances,’ and nobody really seems to be sure where it starts and stops. Except for the police. They know it when they see it.”
http://reason.com/archives/2013/07/31/cops-dont-necessarily-need-a-warrant-to
Related posts:
New Hampshire police Taser Chinese woman who tried to buy too many iPhones
Cop Tases Drug Suspect in the Back For Not Crossing His Ankles Quickly Enough
Cop Misses Unarmed Woman, Shoots 6-Year-Old Boy Dead Instead
Dan Rather: NSA ‘is demolishing the trust in the government’
Nvidia's new Santa Clara campus could rival Apple's 'spaceship'
“Russian Facebook” founder flees after refusing to turn over user data
IRS Buying Spying Equipment: Covert Cameras in Coffee Trays, Plants
Why Is the Navy Building a Shiny Drone Base in Sunny Malibu?
Graham says FBI should confront people who view ‘Islamist’ websites
Why Rising Rates Will Be Good for Your Investments
India mulling further efforts to curb gold imports
Tyranny For Profit
Cyprus gets €2bn EU bailout despite money laundering concerns
School forces 25 hungry students to throw away lunches when they couldn’t pay
Warriors news: Will Golden State accept Bitcoin next?