
“We know we’re secure in our ‘persons, houses, papers, and effects’ unless the cops demonstrate probable cause to a judge and get a warrant. Except… Except when they don’t. The fact of the matter is that police have a lot of leeway to bust your door down and take a look around if they fear that waiting for a warrant could lead to loss of evidence or danger to people. Or lead to something, anyway. That end run around the Fourth Amendment is called ‘exigent circumstances,’ and nobody really seems to be sure where it starts and stops. Except for the police. They know it when they see it.”
http://reason.com/archives/2013/07/31/cops-dont-necessarily-need-a-warrant-to
Related posts:
Senate Committee Votes in Favor of NSA Phone-Records Snooping
Obama: Persecution of LGBT people violates basic morality
Armed Mundanes: The Reason Why SWAT Teams Exist
NJ Police Lieutenant: Meeting Ticket Quotas A Daily Exercise In “Creative Writing”
Court Allows Destruction of Digital Voting Records Amid Hacking Fears
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Next Bull Market
L.A. Residents Plead With LAPD On Signs, Shirts: ‘Don’t Shoot, I’m Not Chris Dorner’
"You Know How to Leave": Scenes from a Police Riot in Idaho Falls
Paul Kemp-Robertson: Bitcoin. Sweat. Tide. Meet the future of branded currency.
Documents Suggest Close Relationship Between NSA, U.S. Companies
Colorado to grant Secret Service vast new powers
Meet “badBIOS,” the mysterious malware that jumps airgaps
Massachusetts billboard depicts little girl giving Obama the finger
Mark Spitznagel expecting a 40% stock market crash
Homeland Security Wants Facial Recognition To Identify Travelers