“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
German Intelligence Worked Closely with NSA on Data Surveillance
Winklevoss twins say Bitcoin could become a country's currency
Muslim union demands pope apology, accuses him of sedition
Bitcoin Believers See a Role for Wall Street
Mexican prosecutor who led bungled investigation named as spy chief
France 'totally bankrupt', says labour minister Michel Sapin
Parents now face hard consequences for leaving kids in car
How to Decode the True Meaning of What NSA Officials Say
Iraq Kurds reach out to Baghdad to fight surging al Qaeda
India gives top security protection to country’s richest man Mukesh Ambani
Russia Will Probably Hold Rates After Surprise Inflation Jump
BRICS establish $100bn bank and currency pool to cut out West
The New Truth About the Cop Shot in Watertown: Friendly-Fire in a Getaway
Bitcoin start-up nabs Goldman board member
Police Arrest 60-Year-Old Woman Speaking At City Council Meeting
