“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
Human Rights Watch: U.S. covering up the extent of waterboarding in CIA prisons
Rally at Oklahoma Capitol opposes U.S. intervention in Syria
Romney May Be Nominated Early
Ten years after war, Iraq emerges as a major arms buyer
Wikileaks release of TPP deal text stokes 'freedom of expression' fears
Witness: Interior Secretary Salazar threatened Colorado reporter
David Crane's Green Vision For Carbon-Belching NRG Energy
Welcome to the Freest Place on Earth
Venezuela's Central Bank to Trade Gold with Goldman Sachs
Britain issues first non-Chinese sovereign RMB bond
SEC, billionaire Mark Cuban set for insider trading trial
Gun Bill in Missouri Would Test Limits in Nullifying U.S. Law
Supreme court cellphone case puts free speech – not just privacy – at risk
Euro Zone to Hike Bailout Fund to 2 Trillion Euros
Robot suit designed to aid the physically challenged and elderly gets global safety certificate
