“With its so-called signature strikes, Washington often goes after people whose identity it does not know but who appear to be behaving like militants in insurgent-controlled areas. The strikes end up killing enemies of the Pakistani, Somali, and Yemeni militaries who may not threaten the United States at all. Worse, because the targets of such strikes are so loosely defined, it seems inevitable that they will kill some civilians. The drone campaign has morphed, in effect, into remote-control repression: the direct application of brute force by a state, rather than an attempt to deal a pivotal blow to a movement.”
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/08/foreign-affairs-magazine-drones-may-be.html
Related posts:
Romney Fears Ron Paul Forces at GOP Convention; Wants to be Nominated Early
Indian forces shoot six Kashmir protesters dead
Overstock CEO: Why we're accepting bitcoins
How Americans were swindled by the hidden cost of the Iraq war
Twitter CEO defends ‘principled’ data gathering policy
Civil liberties groups launch StopWatching.us to protest surveillance
Gold Seen Luring Wealthy as Central Bankers Expand Stimulus
Glenn Greenwald: Snowden’s Files Are Out There if ‘Anything Happens’ to Him
Ohio governor wants to tax funerals, concerts, parking garages
Ex-FBI agent lands at CNN after blaming his departure on 'relentless attacks'
Malfeasance at State Police Crime Lab
San Francisco arrests under review after officers' slur-filled texts revealed
Swedish warning
Bitcoin Grows Up But That Means FBAR Filings
Made Poor by the Crisis: Millions of Europeans Require Red Cross Food Aid