“In short, the Holder Memorandum directs prosecutors to prevent application of mandatory minimum sentences for a select group of less-culpable defendants. Isn’t this A good thing? Yes, with a but. It’s a good thing that the Jane Does of the world can be sentenced according to the judge’s discretion and not according to mandatory minimum sentences. A lot of low-level, unsophisticated, and hapless mules and mopes and dupes will get far lower sentences, which is both just and less expensive for you, the taxpayer.
But I’m not happy that the methodology for the change is a fairly dramatic expansion of prosecutorial discretion.”
Related posts:
QE3 – Pay Attention If You Are in the Real Estate Market
Stossel: No Regulation? No Problem
Don’t Fall Victim to Hoarding
Criminals do not need guns
The "Blowback" That Neocons Do Understand
Amazon.com Creates 5,000 Jobs, Destroys 25,000 in the Process?
Something’s not all right with Medicare
Obama, the US Liar-in-Chief
Peter Schiff: Bitcoin vs. Gold
Jamie Dimon Knows What You Don't Need to Know About U.S. Default
What Do Americans Know That Their Government Doesn’t Know?
Bill Bonner: What does money represent?
Obama Administration Denies AP Requests For Syria Evidence
When The Media Lauded Clinton's Gestapo Immigration Tactics
FT 'Explains' the Decline and Fall of the West