“In short, the Holder Memorandum directs prosecutors to prevent application of mandatory minimum sentences for a select group of less-culpable defendants. Isn’t this A good thing? Yes, with a but. It’s a good thing that the Jane Does of the world can be sentenced according to the judge’s discretion and not according to mandatory minimum sentences. A lot of low-level, unsophisticated, and hapless mules and mopes and dupes will get far lower sentences, which is both just and less expensive for you, the taxpayer.
But I’m not happy that the methodology for the change is a fairly dramatic expansion of prosecutorial discretion.”
Related posts:
China has much at risk but no reach in Middle East
Jim Rogers ET NOW Interview - 29 May 2013
Chemical Weapons in Syria? Who Cares!
Bill Bonner: It’s a dangerous time of year
Peter Schiff: The Golden Cycle
Jacob Hornberger: A Glimmer of Light from Switzerland
Investors Say: “Mises Was Right!”
Bill Bonner: Can the Fed's "Credit Cure" Really Work?
A Weapon Guide for the Uninformed
The Really Scary Thing about the TSA
50,000 Yemeni children dead; UK-US-Saudi war enters horrific new stage
Peter Schiff: Protecting Workers "Rights" Protects Them From Getting Jobs
Ignorance, Intelligence, and War-making
How Do Ponzi Schemes End?
Imagining a Legal Basis for Obama's Overseas Assassinations