
“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
Reports: Speeding Not A Cause Of Child Accidents
$11 Trillion Increase in Federal Debt in One Year
Santa Monica residents push city council to rein in outdoors fitness classes
Not a Peep from Obama: Violent Crime Now at a 42-Year Low
Two Gold ETFs Ripe For A Buy: GDX, GDXJ
Ben Swann on the Liberty Rising Truth in Media Project and the State of US Journalism
The U.N.’s complicity in international human rights abuses
Copyright Becomes a Parody of Itself: Art History Textbook Contains No Actual Art
Energy harvester that creates power from ambient vibrations comes to market
Veterans struggle with benefit claims thanks to missing war records
The Ex-Im Bank Is Dead (For Now)
The Silent Slaughter of the US Air War
Dwolla CEO Ben Milne: Why charge 25 cents for an $11 million transaction
‘WAR SUX’ license plate banned for ‘emotional wellbeing of youth’
A View of the ‘Real China’ from Beijing’s Wangfujing Street