
“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
Support the Troops with Peace and the 'Right to Try'
Hoarding Gold: China’s Plan for Survival
FBI informant armed and trained Black Panthers
Northern Michigan Secession
Internet Giants Got Millions From Taxpayers to Cover PRISM Spying Costs
Justice Department won’t bring charges over CIA interrogations
How Millennials will shape the future of work
How To Get Kicked Off Your Flight
Bank of America supplied answers on ‘independent’ foreclosure review
What Forced Separation Feels Like
Elderly couple pulled over, questioned after their Buckeye car decal is mistaken for a marijuana lea...
Missouri Legislature Nullifies All Federal Gun Control Measures by a Veto-Proof Majority
SpaceX hits two milestones in plan for low-latency satellite broadband
Jim Rogers: Russian/Chinese/Brazil currency can battle dollar dominance
US Foreign Wealth Confiscation Begins: FinCen, FATCA and FBAR