“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
No, Trump, More Executions Won't Win the Drug War
Chamath Palihapitiya Owns $5 Million In Bitcoins, Wants $10-$15 Million
Three Strikes and You're Out: After 20 Years, Is the Law Working?
Skype Translator Preview now open to all Windows users
Database hacking spree on US Army, NASA, others costs gov’t millions
State Dept cites D-Day as example of ‘strong relationship’ with Germany
Catalan politicians ask for EU help against Spanish army
Jim Rogers: "Nothing Good In India"
Jury Nullification Victory For New Jersey Weedman
How Khan Academy (Free) Transformed an Inner-City School
Mom Of Seven Dies In Prison After Judge Jailed Her For Kids’ Truancy
Let’s Thank President Obama for Reminding Americans that They Should Distrust the IRS
County sheriff has used stingray over 300 times with no warrant
Fed's Big Ag Policy is Anything But "Green"
India Trade Deficit Deteriorates As Gold Imports Soar 138%