“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
DEA Agents Sold Opioids, Stole Cash, and Falsely Identified Drug Suspects
Peter Thiel’s Seasteading Dream Floats On
US Bank Run Imminent? FDIC Expanded Deposit Insurance Ends Dec 31st
Thieves drain 2FA-protected bank accounts by abusing mobile networks
IP address does not prove online piracy, says landmark US ruling
China’s Central Bank Subsidizes the Federal Deficit
Monetary Mavens Talk, Talk, Talk
Watchers watched: Boston cops grumpy over GPS trackers on cruisers
US, Turkish Troops Headed For Military Showdown In Syria
EnChroma Glasses May Permanently Cure Color Blindness
Israel Attacks Syria -- US Next?
Four States Advance Legislation To Block NDAA Indefinite Detention
Feds Cry Wolf, Again
Pay me in gold: Romania's new term as it gets more of Rosia Montana
California collects, owns and sells infants' DNA samples