“The US bombing of Syrian chemical weapons stores is said to be logistically all but impossible, and, more importantly would risk a mass-disbursement of deadly chemicals that could kill thousands upon thousands of Syrian civilians who happen to live in proximity. Tomahawk missiles are enormous, thousand-pound bombs. Are we expected to believe that there will be no collateral damage? To punish Assad for what it claims (with no evidence) is the killing of a couple of hundred civilians, the US is planning a strike that could kill tens of thousands of civilians. One is a war crime and the other is not?”
Related posts:
What's in the Vault?
Glenn Greenwald: Newtown kids v Yemenis and Pakistanis: what explains the disparate reactions?
"State Control": What the UN Firearms Treaty is All About
ISIS: Made in Washington, Riyadh – and Tel Aviv
Oppose War with Syria
Filling the FATCA void
Eric Margolis: The Cultural Revolution Still Haunts China
Jeffrey Tucker: The War Is On You
Honduras Startup City Redux: from RED to ZEDE to … Freedom?
Justin Raimondo: Is America a Free Country?
Ron Paul: US Action in Mali is Another Undeclared War
Edward Snowden and Joshua Glover
Why I think the NSA is lying
Why Bitcoin is poised to break out to all-time highs
John Hussman: Reversing the Speculative Effect of QE Overnight
