“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
Blackberry CEO: Apple has gone to a “dark place” with pro-privacy stance
Japanese Are Bailing Out of US Treasury Bonds
Pilot puts aviation career on hold to work on Bitcoin startup
Bernanke Is Blind As A Bat
Cancer Researchers Are On The Verge Of Human Trials With Cannabis
Fast food workers stage surprise strike in New York City
Why Sir John Templeton renounced US citizenship – AKA why the US shot itself in the foot
Utah Gets Ready To Do Without the Feds
Is Detroit a Self-Defense Haven?
Airport security boss fired after mass email photo of his genitals
Run4Guns In Utah. It Annoys Gun Control Advocates.
Bitcoin: China’s New Special Economic Zone
Why Bitcoin Terrifies Big Banks: Andreas Antonopoulos
Is Underwear a Legitimate Function of the Federal Government?
The Massive OPM Hack Actually Hit 25 Million People