“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
Occupy debt-relief campaign buys, forgives $100,000 worth of debt
Fake Bloomberg News created to pump and dump Twitter stock
What Is Hemp Plastic
The Architect of Obamacare is Now Cashing in By Using Obamacare to Sue Insurers
Congressional Report Warns of Potential Bitcoin Threat to US Dollar
Trump's New Iran Sanctions Take Nike Shoes Off World Cup Team's Feet
"Progressive" Hypocrisy on House-to-House Searches
The NSA Playset: Espionage tools for the rest of us
British Politicians Declare War on Knives
Antigua set to bypass US copyright law with WTO green-lit media, software sales website
Putin: Syria chem arms handover will work only if US calls off strike
Italy's ex-intelligence chief given 10-year sentence for role in CIA kidnapping
Bullish at the Bottom: Why Now is the Time to Buy Commodities
Who Was Killed in America's Drug War Last Year?
Long Shot: Inside the Scope of Smart Weapons