“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
Georgia: The New CIA-NATO Arab Terrorist Training Center
New Orleans Cop Gets Four Years For Fatal Drug Raid Shooting
Does your Senator want war?
Audio catches cops shouting ‘Burn this motherf*cker!’ during Dorner siege
Tennessee: Officer Testimony Beats Hard Evidence in Speeding Case
After the IG Report, Let’s Kill the FBI While We Can
Breaking the NSA Spy Ring: “What Rule of Law” Would Look Like
Weed Warrior: Keith Stroup
George Galloway on Syria - 2013
US Photo Enforcement Market Becoming Less Profitable
Bitcoin Stares Down Impending Apocalypse (Again)
McCain blasts Rand Paul’s filibuster as a ‘political stunt’
Senate Votes Against Fourth Amendment Protection Act
Government Studies the Studies (You Can't Make This Up)
In First Day With Bitcoin, Overstock Does $126,000 in Sales