“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
Related posts:
Big Tech Insiders Selling Their Stocks Faster Than Any Time In History
How Hackers Use Bots to Score Prime Restaurant Reservations
Faking It: How the Media Manipulates the World into War [2012]
Carroll County passes resolution opposing new Maryland gun law
Bernanke: Bitcoin 'May Hold Long-Term Promise'
Thousands of Germans rally to end government spying
RoboCoin’s Bitcoin ATM lets you buy Bitcoin with cash: ‘grandma friendly’
Federal Bank VP: Bitcoin Threat Means Banks Must ‘Adapt or Die’
Wanna Die? Get Real Animated In Public
Jim Rogers: Russian/Chinese/Brazil currency can battle dollar dominance
Toyota Camry Tops Ford F-150 as the Most American Made Car
Bill Bonner: Do You Live Next to One of These Spy Hubs?
The Nudge That Will Force Banks to Put More Money Into Treasury Securities
Syrian Insurgent Provocations: Going For Endgame?
No way out: Julian Assange marks one year inside Ecuadorian embassy in UK