“For example, they might send info to the DEA about a likely drug deal, and the DEA would then tell its agents that they should come up with a pretense to stop a certain truck at a certain truck stop at a certain time. The agents would work with local police to concoct a reason to pull the truck over, and voila, drugs found. But, most importantly, at no point would the fact that such information was used to lead to the stop be revealed, and that’s unconstitutional. If you’re accused, you’re supposed to have access to all of the evidence being used against you.
(Visited 28 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Responding to Scandals and Corruption, the IRS Rewards Itself with Giant Bonuses
Guess Why Hundreds of Bus Boys Just Lost Their Jobs
Number Of Nation's Sheriffs Refusing To Enforce Unconstitutional Gun Laws Snowballs
Final Score: Dwight Howard 8,000,000 – Jerry Brown 0
FATCA System Fails Government Probe, Threatens Privacy
NATO Vows Biggest Buildup against Russia since Cold War
The Military Industrial Complex Will Bankrupt America
Bitcoin Has Gone On An Insane Surge
Massachusetts Snatches Child Over Psychiatric Treatment Disagreement
Senators Authorizing Syria Strike Got More Cash From Military-Industrial Complex
Justin Raimondo: Sneaking Back Into Iraq
Wall Street's Fair Value of Bitcoin - Inside Bitcoins NYC 2014
Bernanke’s Bust: Median Household Income Is Lower Today Than in 2009
Californians Sign Petition Allowing U.S. Troops to Commandeer Homes
Citing Racial Disparities, Rand Paul Favors Restoration Of Felon Voting Rights