
“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
Democrats Grant 'Treasonous' Trump Vast Warrantless Spying Powers
How to make a fortune out of the upcoming IPOs in Dubai and Abu Dhabi
How Gamers Could Save the (Real) World
In-Person Bitcoin Exchanges Are Thriving
The Future Of The Blockchain
Ron Holland on Protecting Your Wealth in Perilous Times
'Syrian rebels plan chem attack on Israel from Assad-controlled territories'
The Ex-Google Hacker Taking on the World’s Spy Agencies
Singapore government decides not to interfere with Bitcoin
Iraq: The ‘Humanitarian Catastrophe’ That Petered Out
Government's definition of 'terrorist' encompasses practically everyone
Adam Kokesh Blog Statement On Arrest
Monetary Madness, Part II
Australia liberated from their long national green nightmare
Hands On With The KnCMiner Jupiter, The Massive BTC Mining Rig