“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
Video of police performing house-to-house raids in Watertown MA
Hackers turn Square reader into card skimmer in under 10 minutes
The Fundamental Characteristic that Recommends Janet Yellen
State oil fund makes all Norwegians crown millionaires
Big Banks Start Campaign to Destroy Credit Unions
Human Intelligence is Slowly Declining: Genetics Or Food?
Congress’s Plans to Lock You in
Ben Swann Interviews G. Edward Griffin
Army’s $900 Million in Warehouses Full of Useless Vehicle Parts
Obama’s Lies, NSA Spies, and the Sons of Liberty
Vibram required to stop all health claims about its FiveFinger shoes
AZ Court Says You Don't Have to Be High to Get a DUI
City of Detroit Files for Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
Pelosi booed at Netroots while defending espionage charges against Snowden
Maryland cop probed for installing camera in boys’ school bathroom