
“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
Fmr. NSA chief: Snowden defenders ‘20-somethings who haven’t talked to the opposite sex’
The Total Failure Of Gun Control Captured In One Photo
Ron Paul: Why Designate North Korea a 'State Sponsor of Terrorism'?
The Top 5 Bitcoin Shops
Jane Marquardt: “Progressive” Prison Profiteer
NYC Mayor Seeks to Ban Short-Stay Residential Room Hotels
The Basics of Internationalization
Julian Assange: The Modern State Is Acting Like A Mongol Horde
It might cost you $39K to crowdfund $100K under the SEC’s new rules
Still no list of Q4 2012 ex-Americans in the Federal Register
JPMorgan's $13B Penalty Helps IRS Deal A Huge Blow to Homeowners
World War III: The False Narrative that Fuels Conflict in Syria and Beyond
Records Obtained Detailing Obama Administration’s Warrantless Collection of Citizens’ Personal Finan...
Senate Committee Votes in Favor of NSA Phone-Records Snooping
Is the Constitution Bailing Out the Banks?