“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care
Price of Lunch with Warren Buffett Crashes
Calculating the ROI of a 4-Year College Degree
Ranking the States for Economic and Personal Freedom
Dubai’s gold trade waits on India windfall
US, Turkish Troops Headed For Military Showdown In Syria
Marc Faber on shadow banking, market psychology, & the global impact of American monetary policy
Irish Company Now Paying Employees’ Salaries in Bitcoin
The Bubble: film official trailer
Who Is Most Excited For Athletes To Win Olympic Gold? The IRS.
CDC Report Fatally Shoots Obama’s Theory of Gun Violence
Congress Wants the IRS to Cancel Your Passport
Medical marijuana bill approved by New Hampshire House
Video: Huge Protests In Brazil Sweep The Country
Delinquent US student loans hit record high, over $100 billion past due