“What good would ‘a shot across Syria’s bow’ actually do? A ‘limited strike’ is not going to bring down the Assad regime and it is certainly not going to end the bloody civil war that has been raging inside Syria. The al-Qaeda affiliated rebels that would take power would almost certainly be even worse than Assad. Even in the midst of this bloody civil war, the rebels have taken the time and the effort to massacre entire Christian villages. Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with helping such monsters? There is no good outcome in Syria. The Assad regime is absolutely horrible and the rebels are even worse. Why would we want the U.S. military to get involved in such a mess?”
Related posts:
Kucinich: Top 10 Unproven Claims for War Against Syria
Turkish Fighter Jets Repeatedly Violate Greek Airspace As Lira Free-Falls
Coinbase: First $1,000,000 USD in merchant processing is now free!
Street Smarts with Jim Rogers
L.A.-area lost hikers may have to pay $160,000 for manhunt after drugs found in their car
The Top 4 Lessons of the Cyprus Debacle You Shouldn’t Have to Re-learn
More Cops in Schools Is the Wrong Answer to Mass Shootings
Why Have Police In America Turned Into Such Ruthless Thugs?
Luxury Berlin Apartment bought with Bitcoin
Pennsylvanians Coerced To Give Cheek Swabs at 'Voluntary' Checkpoint
UPDATE: Adam Kokesh SWAT Raid Yields Multiple Felonies
Foodflation - Since QE3, Breakfast Is Up Over 24%
Police sued after charging girl with making up rape claim about serial rapist
83-year-old nun gets 20 year sentence for ‘symbolic’ nuclear facility break-in
The First BTC "Fair Value" Reco Has A Stunning Price Target