
“What good would ‘a shot across Syria’s bow’ actually do? A ‘limited strike’ is not going to bring down the Assad regime and it is certainly not going to end the bloody civil war that has been raging inside Syria. The al-Qaeda affiliated rebels that would take power would almost certainly be even worse than Assad. Even in the midst of this bloody civil war, the rebels have taken the time and the effort to massacre entire Christian villages. Why is Barack Obama so obsessed with helping such monsters? There is no good outcome in Syria. The Assad regime is absolutely horrible and the rebels are even worse. Why would we want the U.S. military to get involved in such a mess?”
Related posts:
Forget the Cellphone Fight — We Should Be Allowed to Unlock Everything We Own
When can your government kill you?
Once again the Winklevoss twins get beaten to launching their big idea
Obama: No warrantless wiretaps if you elect me [2008]
Is the TSA checking domestic airline passengers for warrants?
Secrets From The Sexist Pitchbook Of One Of Wall Street’s More Notorious Firms
Bruce Schneier: Economist Detained for Doing Math on an Airplane
10 Small or remote places that have embraced Bitcoin
Poll: Nearly One Third Of Americans Would Accept ‘TSA Body Cavity Search’ in Order to Fly
Drones 101
Orwell Reigns Over Raw Milk Trial
Roger Ver, Bitcoin Angel Investor, Talks About The Bitcoin Revolution
The NSA Is Hiring! And Following A Pittsburgh Car Dealership On Its Twitter Account?
China begins direct convertibility to Asia’s #1 financial center, Singapore
The FBI Seized All of TorMail's Data and Is Using It to Catch Hackers