“A U.S. bombing of Syria is an aggression because it cannot be justified by claiming defense or national interests. The U.S. cannot claim that it is acting for the world or the world’s good, surely not when it is being warned outright by other nations that the results may well be catastrophic. The U.S. cannot claim it is enforcing a treaty because Syria has not agreed to a chemical weapons treaty. Furthermore, the existing agreement among states did not include a provision that declares non-signers as outlaws and then authorizes the U.S. to be the policeman. The U.S. is acting unilaterally and outside the bounds of international law.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/is-the-u-s-the-worlds-moral-authority-as-obama-thinks/
Related posts:
Smearing Glenn Greenwald: The Gregorian Connection
Threat from China Is Being Hyped
James Bovard: Comey firing justly knocks FBI off its pedestal
Bill Bonner: Time for a Cease-Fire In the War on Poverty
Are American taxpayers financially responsible to defend Syrians?
Why Cops Bust Down Doors of Medical Pot Growers, But Ignore Men Who Keep Naked Girls on Leashes
The Hidden Cost of Oil
World learns to manage without the US
Who Wants War with Syria?
Obama and Israel Stoke a Sectarian Shia-Sunni War
ECB: Bank With Us … and We’ll Charge You Interest
Greek Dilemma: A Product of the Dialectic
Bill Bonner: Who Sanctions America?
Don’t Buy Into the Bond Mania
This Could Shake Muni Bonds to the Core
