“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
Related posts:
Why Are European Governments So Terrified of 'Fake News'?
India's central bank shuts down all cryptocurrency exchanges
So You Want To Short The Student Loan Bubble? Now You Can
Own your Identity with BitShares
Google, Yahoo, and Facebook Are Scrambling: “We Never Cooperated with the NSA!”
Navy: Training, testing may kill whales, dolphins
HSBC Whistleblower Speaks, Uncovered Terrorist Financing
They’re Coming for Your Accounts
Kidnapped by a Caribbean Murder Gang
Apple Loses Rights to Sell iPhone Brand in Mexico
Republicans: Abandon Benghazi, and Talk about Hillary’s Other Foibles
Don’t Get Fooled Again — It’s Time to Dump Bonds Now
Plainclothes NH State Police officer gets warrant to rob reporter of his camera
The Booming Industry of Legal Marijuana: The Next Dot-Com
Cannabis for Elders: A Precarious State