
“According to an article at the top of the New York Times website, even a well-executed strategic strike against the nation could aggravate tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia — both nations that seek to dominate the region politically and militarily — and actually have the effect of buoying up Syria’s beleaguered President Bashar al-Assad. Middle East watchers say that the only truly predictable thing about the highly unstable region is that any actions will produce unintended consequences. They warn of a possible Assad-bolstering surge of anti-Americanism or even a spreading of hostilities to other countries in the region, including Turkey and Israel.”
Related posts:
Survey Finds that 41 Percent of Small Business Owners Have Frozen Hiring Because of Obamacare
Four arrested during protest of nudity ban in San Francisco
WarGames for real: How one 1983 exercise nearly triggered WWIII
Tech Millionaire Brings Bitcoin to Australian Stock Exchange
How Many Die From Medical Mistakes in U.S. Hospitals?
Retired Couple Turn Into World Traveling Nomads
CNY Challenges EUR For Second Largest Bitcoin Exchange Volume
Tony Gallippi Talks Newest BitPay Innovation: Copay
One Man’s Quest to Prove Saudi Arabia Bankrolled 9/11
Are Corporate America’s Buybacks A Scam?
Guantánamo By the Numbers
World Gold Council to teach central bankers how to trade gold
6 cutting-edge bank alternatives
A Western Alternative to the West
Amazon employees protest sale of facial recognition software to police