“If the U.S. unilaterally bombs Syria, it can’t possibly be an act of neutral justice in response to a chemical attack. Why not? Several reasons. (1) The U.S. has supported anti-Assad (anti-Syrian) rebel forces against Assad for several years. (2) The U.S. has not been a neutral presence in that region since 1919. [..] (3) The U.S. has selected immediate violence as a response without taking the time to pursue other remedies. (4) The U.S. is threatening to act on incomplete information. (5) The existing framework of international law doesn’t allow for unilateral bombing by the U.S. or any other state. (6) Any attack may kill and wound innocent Syrians. [..] ”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-not-an-act-of-justice/
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Despite panic, China’s regulation of Bitcoin leaves room for optimism
Gentlemen, Start Your Presses
Bitcoin Should Get Ready for an Attack
Paul Craig Roberts: Another Western War Crime In The Making
Bill Bonner: Here’s Proof That Wealthy Elites Control Washington
‘Boston Strong’: Marching in Lockstep with the Police State
No Military Coups for America? What About November 1963?
Jacob Hornberger: Gun Control? What About U.S. Arms Sales?
Ron Paul: What No One Wants to Hear About Benghazi
Eric Margolis: Storm On The Nile
The “Moral Obscenity” of Washington’s Empire
Obama and Israel Stoke a Sectarian Shia-Sunni War
Eric Margolis: Spying Run Amok
Judge Napolitano: Obama Has Not Hesitated To Kill Foreign & American Innocent Children With Drones
The Nunes Memo Matters—But Not For the Reason You Think