“As NJ Senator Robert Menendez said at the Kerry hearing today in the Senate, Syria is about Iran. And it is for AIPAC too. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee broke its silence today, urging a vote for the Syrian strike. AIPAC was lying low. That was what everyone said. So: Who called AIPAC? And: why does Obama need AIPAC? Could it be because AIPAC can get 70 Senators’ signatures on a napkin in 24 hours? Also, if the Tea Party is so ‘isolationist,’ as the media keep insisting, then why is Marco Rubio gungho on a Syria attack? Does it have anything to do with presidential ambitions?”
Related posts:
Dentist Attacked for Charging Too Little For Teeth Cleaning
NSA Spokesman Accidentally Admits that the Government Is Spying On Virtually All Americans
WikiLeaks: Council on Foreign Relations Controls Most Mainstream Media
Jim Rogers: How High (or Low) Will Gold Go?
Senate Shuts Down Rand Paul Filibuster Against Surveillance Act Renewal
Why bitcoin has a firm foothold in the online gambling world
Bitcoin: What are bitcoins?
California Gov. Brown tells the Obama administration to back off on marijuana
US Experimented on Hundreds of Poor Pregnant Women With Radiation
Obama: Our ideals and principles, national security at stake in Syria
Seattle's Minimum Wage Killed the 'Five-Dollar Footlong'
Walking in Broad Daylight is “Suspicious” Behavior
Police Department Planted Drugs on Young Black Men For Years; D.A. Complicit
Tennessee: Officer Testimony Beats Hard Evidence in Speeding Case
Second-Grade Teacher Suspended for Showing Children Garden Tools