“Initiating airstrikes in Syria would undermine rather than uphold the credibility of the UN Charter, which generally permits the use of non-defensive force only with Security Council authorization. That has not been granted. The charter’s purpose is in fact to prevent individual states from engaging in the sort of international policing the US is proposing to undertake in Syria. Ultimately, it isn’t clear where the administration could turn for legal justification in the event of a no vote in Congress. Even without a strong legal foundation, if the administration decides to proceed with airstrikes, there isn’t much Congress could do to stop it.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/06/if-congress-says-no-can-obama-strike-syria/
(Visited 32 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Could China make or break bitcoin?
Congress Votes NO On VA Hospitals Prescribing Cannabis To Veterans
Jim Rogers: I am sceptical India government will deliver on promises
Slump in gold price releases years of pent-up retail demand
IRS Probe of Bitcoin Goes Too Far, GOP Warns
Germany ‘exporting’ elderly to foreign retirement homes
South African banks in massive credit card data breach
Sen. Chambliss: 'We can't just leave event security to communities'
Obama Hints At Military Intervention In Syria
Syria air defense head killed by US-backed jihadist rebels
What Government Schools Can Teach Us About Government Health Care
Police Chief Indicted in Federal Court For Helping Meth Traffickers
The Hookah Lounge War Is On
Woman sues Japan’s biggest yakuza boss, seeking refund of ‘protection money'
Fmr. Comptroller David Walker: To help end budget gimmicks, pass this bill