
“Initiating airstrikes in Syria would undermine rather than uphold the credibility of the UN Charter, which generally permits the use of non-defensive force only with Security Council authorization. That has not been granted. The charter’s purpose is in fact to prevent individual states from engaging in the sort of international policing the US is proposing to undertake in Syria. Ultimately, it isn’t clear where the administration could turn for legal justification in the event of a no vote in Congress. Even without a strong legal foundation, if the administration decides to proceed with airstrikes, there isn’t much Congress could do to stop it.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/06/if-congress-says-no-can-obama-strike-syria/
Related posts:
Men Find Careers in Collecting Disability
Gun charge dropped after police attempt to enforce non-existent law
Obama Secret Syria Order Authorizes Support For Rebels
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran Brandon Raub
Bank of England's Tucker Says He’s Open to QE as BOE Stresses Flexibility
Jim Rogers: An 'even worse catastrophe’ is coming
Egyptian protesters tore down U.S. embassy flag
Centuries-old disfiguring plague breaks out due to the war in Syria
Tennessee Highway Patrol using semi-trucks to combat texting
Denmark scraps world’s first fat tax [2012]
90-year-old Fort Lauderdale man arrested twice for feeding homeless
China may cut U.S. debt holdings
Julius Bär bank clients now targeted in US tax probe
Head of the IMF Christine Lagarde in court charged with embezzlement and fraud
‘Putin in drag’ artist seeks asylum in France