
“Initiating airstrikes in Syria would undermine rather than uphold the credibility of the UN Charter, which generally permits the use of non-defensive force only with Security Council authorization. That has not been granted. The charter’s purpose is in fact to prevent individual states from engaging in the sort of international policing the US is proposing to undertake in Syria. Ultimately, it isn’t clear where the administration could turn for legal justification in the event of a no vote in Congress. Even without a strong legal foundation, if the administration decides to proceed with airstrikes, there isn’t much Congress could do to stop it.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/06/if-congress-says-no-can-obama-strike-syria/
Related posts:
U.S. demands release of Americans imprisoned in Iran
Russian central bank to keep buying gold
Italy Denies Risk to Public Finances From Debt Derivative Deals
Smackdown: Glenn Greenwald versus Mika Brzezinski
New Zealand military told to soften manual that equates media with extremist groups
Rep. Peter King: US could make preemptive strike on North Korea
Bitcoin ATM processed $1 million last month, more machines coming
A Long List of What We Know Thanks to Private Manning
'A tide of squatters’ spreads in Spain in wake of foreclosures
Hedge Funds Gear Up for Another Big Short: High-Yield Bonds
Cop violently arrests nurse for refusing to draw blood from unconscious crash victim
8 things you can buy with bitcoins right now
Health care law's tax hikes are coming: Who pays?
Show me the money: Hong Kong in "biggest ever" Bitcoin giveaway
Pentagon Needs Battle Plan for Troop-Suicide Threat