“Initiating airstrikes in Syria would undermine rather than uphold the credibility of the UN Charter, which generally permits the use of non-defensive force only with Security Council authorization. That has not been granted. The charter’s purpose is in fact to prevent individual states from engaging in the sort of international policing the US is proposing to undertake in Syria. Ultimately, it isn’t clear where the administration could turn for legal justification in the event of a no vote in Congress. Even without a strong legal foundation, if the administration decides to proceed with airstrikes, there isn’t much Congress could do to stop it.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/06/if-congress-says-no-can-obama-strike-syria/
Related posts:
Jordan says Syrian prime minister has defected with family
David Crane's Green Vision For Carbon-Belching NRG Energy
NHS watchdog: Nurses in tears as 'horrendous' understaffing hits patients
With its leaders facing trial, Kenya quits International Criminal Court
New study reveals: Marijuana may slow, halt progression of Alzheimer's
Hollywood filmmakers engage in ‘artistic surrender’ to keep markets in China open
Trump slaps tariffs on foreign solar panels and washing machines
31 Orlando cops sued for doing nothing while nightclub patrons were massacred
Missouri threatens return of gas chambers for death row inmates
Massachusetts smokers try to get ahead of new cigarette tax
Facebook received more than 25,000 government data requests in the first half of 2013
Governments threatening teens for cutting grass without a business license
Amid exploding wait times, California DMV operator slept 2,200 hours on the job
Licensed Marijuana Grower Sues Cops For Killing His Plants
Egypt fears run on its banks as it imposes limit on amount people can withdraw