“The key political issue that is shaping up here is whether or not the world is a unipolar world politically and militarily, with the superpower U.S. being that pole. The alternative view, which is gaining strength, is that the world is a multipolar world, with many voices. The anti-bombing voices among the American public are rising, and so are voices overseas with a number of different views. The administration and some Congressmen are focused on the ‘message’ that failing to bomb conveys; they are focused on credibility. But what they are missing is that no matter how this event turns out, all the other voices have been entering the conversation.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/syrian-decision-shaping-up-as-unipolar-vs-multipolar/
Related posts:
The Last Secular Arab Country
Ron Paul: A House Divided Over NSA Spying on Americans
Peter Schiff: The Unfriendly Skies
Outrage at Trump is phony; US leaders have praised dictators for decades
Here’s Why Bernanke is Clueless…
The FBI Is an Enemy of Freedom
Jim Bovard: We can't trust White House Syria claims
Richard Ebeling On the Coming Crash in China, On Hayek and Much More
The Phony Trade-off Between Privacy and Security
Let’s Rethink U.S. Policy Toward the Af-Pak Region
War Drums: Trump’s National Security Advisor Threatens Iran
Patrick Buchanan: America Says ‘No!’ to a Beltway War
Four More Years of Bush-Obama Foreign Policy, and Maybe Worse
Our Rulers’ $1.5 Billion "Backup Hard Drive"
Constitution prohibits Trump's pre-emptive strike against N. Korea
