
“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
Related posts:
James Altucher: Why I Won’t Vote
Is The Everything Bubble Ready to Pop?
How to Fight the Modern State
Larken Rose: The Complete and Undeniable Truth
Obamacare is Eliminating My Health Insurance
John Kerry, Organization Man
Americans Are War Weary ... And The Neocons Don't Like It
Euro Pacific Capital Global Investor Newsletter: October 2012
Lower Taxes Tapped a Beer Revolution
Governmental Travel Controls
Jeffrey Tucker: Catastrophic Plans
With the Central Subway Project, the Only Way Out is Through
Jeffrey Tucker: Mises Can Save the World
The Century of Arbitration and Peace
Seeking a Bolthole Community