
“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
Related posts:
Bill Bonner: 6 Success Secrets of a $22-Billion Family
With Enemies Like This, Who Needs Friends?
Andrew J. Bacevich: A Letter to Paul Wolfowitz
Is the Gold Market Manipulated?
David Stockman, Christmas 2015—–Why There Is No Peace On Earth
The One Lesson to Learn Before a Market Crash
Get Ahead of the Pack and Unload Bonds Now
John Hussman: Brexit and the Bubble in Search of A Pin
The US and China: A Difference in Approaches
John Whitehead: Anything Goes When You’re a Cop in America
Ignore Saudi and Israeli Goading for Muscular U.S. Mideast Policy
Inclusionary Zoning Makes Housing Less Affordable
Nazi gold and currency wars - A full guide
Common Core: A Lesson Plan for Raising Up Compliant, Non-Thinking Citizens
When Zero’s Too High: Time preference versus central bankers