“‘Why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only?’ Mises asks. ‘Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?’ When it comes to bad habits, vices, and immoral behavior of others, in contrast to the state, which does everything by ‘compulsion and the application of force,’ Mises considered tolerance and persuasion to be the rules. ‘A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper,’ Mises explains.”
http://mises.org/daily/6563/Mises-Explains-the-Drug-War
Related posts:
Peter Schiff: Soon in America, retirement will be as rare as a single income household
"When Will They Learn?"
A Commissarina Rises: Wendy J. Olson's Reign of Terror
They Live, We Sleep: A Dictatorship Disguised as a Democracy
Libertarian Perspective on Switzerland
Wendy McElroy: Death by Methodological Individualism
Exploding Sunni-Shia Conflict: Impact on Oil, Stocks, and More
Marc Faber on Commodity Cycles and the Wealth Redistribution Craze
Doug Casey on Internationalizing Your Cash
America Is Plunging Into Kafka’s Nightmare
How to Spot a Market Top
The Endgame of State/Local Government Pensions
Publishing Atrocity: The 1963 Edition of Human Action
Fraud in the Financial Markets: Are You Vulnerable?
A Tale of Two Giants: The Elephant and the Dragon