“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
In public shift, Israel calls for Assad's fall
Military’s ‘war on drugs’ back as U.S. Navy looks to net big catches in the Pacific
A potentially powerful new antibiotic is discovered in dirt
Company pensions in peril as shortfalls hit record
‘The U.S. effect’: Researchers encouraged to report exaggerated or eye-catching results
Ex-Hillsboro cop surrenders after shootout with police with wife, daughter at his side
Putin Shows Global Mojo to Russians as U.S. Fumes Over Snowden
South Korean Activists Send Leaflets to North Korea
Mom faces arrest after bringing breast-fed newborn to jury duty
Japan warns Britain to stay in the European Union
$3.3 billion of pork: The 5 most surprising provisions in the debt deal
Turkish PM urges end to Istanbul protests as police pull out after 2 days
U.S. government will finally retire most research chimpanzees but retain 50
The N.S.A.’s top-secret domestic spying program
Iran's Ahmadinejad meets successor after being ousted in election