“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
French Socialist budget minister charged with hiding money in UBS account
Online freedom suffered setbacks in many countries
Suspension over gun-shaped toaster pastry is now permanent mark on kid’s record
Germany lends real value to bitcoin virtual money
Moody’s awards metro Atlanta a ‘credit negative’ for TSPLOST failure
Egypt Ambassador: Objective of Crackdown 'Wasn't to Use Massive Force'
How the Big Guns Are Playing Gold Mining Stocks
U.S. Government Calls for Limits on Companies' Use of Web Data
Echoes of the bubble in agents' descriptions of real estate markets
Britain should stay in European Union, says Obama administration
Texas county returning motorist shakedown cash
Savers boosting bitcoin demand in China, exchange says
Jesse Kline: Behold the power of Bitcoin
Treasury Gets a Citibanker
IMF to Europe: Deliver on Irish bailout