“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
(Visited 27 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
New Hampshire city suing ‘Robin Hood’ for paying parking meters of strangers
Judge orders trial in allegedly missing Oklahoma City bombing video case
Australian central bank's talk of intervention sends Aussie dollar down
Transformation of North San Jose into urban tech hub under way
Many 2011 federal budget cuts had little real-world effect
Britain has invaded all but 22 countries in the world
Laos, Cambodia Stock Exchanges Have A Combined 3 Companies Listed
Can Bitcoin replace PayPal?
US bans uncharged cell phones, laptops from some flights
Think New York Is Costly? In New Delhi, Seedy Goes for 8 Figures
Ex-Port Authority Official Says Christie Knew About Lane Closings
Trump's criticism of Fed rate hikes recalls Nixon
TSA bomb-sniffing dog bites woman at Hartsfield-Jackson
Bankers balk as Postal Service plans payday loans, digital currency
U.S. says oil firms should respect Baghdad government