
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
Blackstone's James Says U.S. May Enter Recession in 2017
Ousted Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi sentenced to death
Drug czar: No state can nullify federal marijuana ban
Greek youth unemployment soars to 64.9% as Biden claims stake in Greece's success
Russian spokesman mocks Britain, the little island
Caller ID inventor struggles to collect royalties despite owning patent
Forgotten founder: YouSendIt’s Khalid Shaikh
Why Cash Costs the U.S. Economy Real Money
Canadian family's $500K inheritance seized by U.S. border officials
Venezuela's gold reserves fall 24% in 18 months
Venezuela's airport 'breathing' tax
Senate approves Obama request to arm, train Syrian rebels
Trade in Bitcoins gains currency among youth in Mumbai
Weed Is Serious Business for Canada’s Go-To Pot Banker
Fed Up With Bitcoin? Here's How To Start Your Own Currency