“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
Deputy charged with pepper spraying teen's pizza during traffic stop
Astonishing Images Show $4.2 Million In Seized Dark Market Drugs
Japan’s Pension Fund Cutting Local Bonds to Buy Equities
French doctors stand trial for covering up deadly radiation overdoses
Iceland proposal to write off debt triggers S&P outlook downgrade
Facebook won’t reward hacker who exposed security flaw in Zuckerberg’s profile
Bulgarian Pres. Blames 'Lack Of Faith In Institutions' For Bank Runs
White House insists NSA surveillance review will be independent
Nepal’s tourism bureau promises to keep ‘tighter control’ of Mount Everest climbs
Trouble on U.S. farms as growers seek workers and crops rot
European Union Stripped of AAA Credit Rating at S&P
Edward Snowden's Leaks Will Not Lead to Change: Intelligence Experts
D.C. Campaign Becomes First To Accept Bitcoin Contributions
What To Expect Next From The American-US Airways Merger
How Americans were swindled by the hidden cost of the Iraq war