
“A grand jury indictment is now sufficient for the feds to throw you in prison and seize virtually everything you own. Sure, the assets are supposed to be tainted in order for prosecutors to seize them. A grand jury must believe there is probable cause that you’re guilty of a crime, and that the assets in question were derived from that crime. But, as an old judge in Tennessee once told me, ‘A grand jury in the hands of a skilled prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich.’ Is this just? What happened to innocent-until-proven-guilty and the right to due process?”
http://www.nestmann.com/supreme-court-confirms-you-really-are-guilty-until-proven-innocent
Related posts:
Peter Schiff Doubles Down on Inflation Prediction
Facebook Removes Declaration of Independence Text as Hate Speech
Tesla's first big vulnerability requires physical access to the car
The Truth About America's Murder Capital
US – Sri Lankans “Asked” to Register with their Banks — What if they don’t do so voluntarily?
MassGOP Chair Bob Maginn and former Congressmen could face jailtime for political and financial corr...
Austerity's End Could Bring Additional German Turmoil
BitPremier Sells Luxury Goods For Bitcoin
Bill Bonner: Should You Turn Bullish in 2014?
Soylent gets a $1.5 million infusion of venture capital
Why Bitcoins Are Just Like Gold
Detroit Cancels City Blight Tour for Creditors
NY school board lawyer fired for calling parent a ‘fat c*nt’
Did you know police have their own Bill of Rights?
Feds Order 14 Million Potassium Iodide Tablets, Refuse Comment