[‘Relatively routine’?] “The US Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it will take up a case examining whether police officers need a warrant before administering an involuntary blood test to a suspected drunk driver. Although the case deals with a relatively routine interaction between police and motorists, the underlying legal issue will help define the scope of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches involving forced blood tests.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Study Indicates That America's Driving Boom is Over
Washington Pot Entrepreneurs Turn To Cash, Bitcoin
Credit card donations to WikiLeaks once again flowing through Iceland
Treasury announces GM exit strategy; automaker buying 200 million shares from U.S.
Saudi Arabia's Secret Holdings of U.S. Debt Are Suddenly a Big Deal
The Company Making Billions Off China’s Worried Parents
Talk of CIA prisons censored at Guantanamo hearing
Ex-OMB Official: The Military’s ‘Readiness’ Scam Worked Again
Officer charged with raping woman while on duty and in uniform
Refugees detail widespread abuse at Australian asylum camp
Women to assume combat roles in U.S. military
Trade in Bitcoins gains currency among youth in Mumbai
Harvey Silverglate: How Robert Mueller Tried To Entrap Me
UN: Iraq violence could lead to civil war
Border Patrol defends raid of Greyhound bus, deportation of grandmother