[‘Relatively routine’?] “The US Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it will take up a case examining whether police officers need a warrant before administering an involuntary blood test to a suspected drunk driver. Although the case deals with a relatively routine interaction between police and motorists, the underlying legal issue will help define the scope of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches involving forced blood tests.”
Related posts:
Colorado theater shooting victims’ families condemn organizers over relief fund
Spaniards Fight to Get $10.3 Billion In Savings Back From Bank Investment Schemes
Germany: Facebook must destroy facial recognition database
Adam Kokesh Interviewed from Jail: "I'll Run For President To Abolish The U.S. Government"
Luxury home prices finally getting too high?
Survival Tips From the World's Second Oldest Bank
Google launches $105 Android One; eyes India smartphone boom
Amid food crisis, Venezuelan president Maduro launches "Salsa Hour" radio show
Obama has not delivered on May’s promise of transparency on drones
Deposit Flight From Europe Banks Eroding Common Currency
IRS Data Web Snares Mostly Low- and Middle-Income Taxpayers
Gene therapy promises to wipe out rare childhood diseases
Upstate New York bids to become federal drone testing site
Officer kills family's dog while 'searching' across front yards
Bottom 60 percent paying for the US boom by substituting debt for savings