[‘Relatively routine’?] “The US Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it will take up a case examining whether police officers need a warrant before administering an involuntary blood test to a suspected drunk driver. Although the case deals with a relatively routine interaction between police and motorists, the underlying legal issue will help define the scope of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches involving forced blood tests.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
China bitcoin arbitrage ends as traders work around capital controls
RNC members tackle Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FATCA
Dad Can’t Buy Daughter Shoes as Argentine Currency Falls
Mo Farah held by US customs on suspicion of being a terrorist as he returned to family home for Chri...
Bank of America intern's death puts banks' working culture in spotlight
US Army vet charged with fighting alongside al-Qaida against Syrian government
Swiss banks agree to U.S. plan on tax evasion
New Zealand military told to soften manual that equates media with extremist groups
Dem Rep. Steve Cohen: Tea Party Republicans Are 'Domestic Enemies'
Koreas declare commitment to full denuclearization, ending 70-year war
Senate committee strikes deal on resolution authorizing force against Syria
HK property developers push HK$1.3 billion in home loans to buyers
Swiss top the tables for household savings
Taiwanese Apple contractor probes claims of labor abuse
Federal Court Says Obama NLRB Appointments Violated Constitution