
“It is the nature of authority to equate dissent with wrongdoing, or at least with a threat. The record is suffused with examples of groups and individuals being placed under government surveillance by virtue of their dissenting views and activism – Martin Luther King, the civil rights movement, anti-war activists, environmentalists. In the eyes of the government and J Edgar Hoover’s FBI, they were all ‘doing something wrong’: political activity that threatened the prevailing order. The opportunity those in power have to characterise political opponents as ‘national security threats’ or even ‘terrorists’ has repeatedly proven irresistible.”
Related posts:
Crooked Judges Want Your Kids for Cash
Why the Government Is Desperately Trying to Inflate a New Housing Bubble
Downside Resilience, Anyone?
On Escaping from Prison
Living the Lockdown Life
BEARCAT Bread And Circuses, Or Why I Ripped Up My Ticket
Ralph Nader: Stopping Barry O'Bomber's Rush to War
All the Value of Gold in the Palm of Your Hand
Is Nicotine Really Any Different Than Caffeine?
Cellphone unlocking is the first step toward post-SOPA copyright reform
Attempts To Eliminate Cash Are More Than A Privacy Disaster
Our Legacy Systems: Dysfunctional, Unreformable
Obamachow: Is National Food Insurance The Next Big Idea?
The Security State’s Reaction to Snowden Shows Why It’s Doomed
Everyone Is Now A Terrorist According to The US Government