
“Just before Snowden became a household name, the ACLU argued before the supreme court that the Fisa Amendments Act – one of the two main laws used by the NSA to conduct mass surveillance – was unconstitutional. [In its dismissal,] the court relied on two claims by the Justice Department to support their ruling: 1) that the NSA would only get the content of Americans’ communications without a warrant when they are targeting a foreigner abroad for surveillance, and 2) that the Justice Department would notify criminal defendants who have been spied on under the Fisa Amendments Act, so there exists some way to challenge the law in court. Neither of those statements were true.”
Related posts:
Billions in Afghan aid could be wasted: U.S. inspector
Woman Injured In Shooting Involving Sheriff's Deputy
China Gold-Mine Deals at Record After Price Plunge
In hard times, "I buy gold" is Italy's boom business
Taken: The Use And Abuse Of Civil Forfeiture
Torture of prisoners persists in Afghanistan: UN
French-led forces in Mali take Timbuktu airport, enter city
Russia warns UK against arming Syrian rebels
Angola approves laws to open stock exchange, debt markets
Bitcoins use by tea trade brought to notice of Ministry, board
French officials furious at Economist "time-bomb" taunt
India: $1.2 million in gold bars found stashed in Boeing 737 bathroom
Google’s Brazil president faces an arrest warrant
Saudi Arabia opens luxury ‘religious extremist’ rehab center for Al-Qaeda militants
Chief Greek Statistician Threatened with Jail For Revealing True Size of Deficit