
“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
Junk-Rated Borrowers Reap Rewards in a World of Negative Yields
EU wants privacy guarantees from U.S. amid PRISM crisis
After vote, China tells Taiwan to abandon independence "hallucination"
American teenager designs compact nuclear reactor
Tarrant lawmaker seeks to create Texas Bullion Depository
Marijuana Industry Growing Faster Than Smartphones
Russia diverts pension savings to plug budget hole for second year
Europeans slammed by austerity measures now enraged by political corruption
Japan's debt-funding costs to hit $257 billion next year
Lithuania turns Google Street View on tax cheats
Are you part of the 'pay-as-you-live' generation?
Thousands of nonviolent offenders get life without parole: ACLU study
Homebuilder helping Millennials trade student loan debt for house debt
Russia warns of ‘war’ if UN plans to cut oil to North Korea are carried out
UK: Greenwald’s partner had ‘highly sensitive stolen information that would help terrorism’