
“The European court found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is ‘inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive’. In deciding what to remove search engines must also have regard to the public interest. These are, of course, very vague and subjective tests. The court also decided that search engines don’t qualify for a ‘journalistic exception’. The examples we’ve seen so far: former politicians wanting posts removed that criticise their policies in office; serious, violent criminals asking for articles about their crimes to be deleted; bad reviews for professionals like architects and teachers; comments that people now regret.”
Related posts:
That dog may cost you $100,000 a day
Why is Gibraltar a British territory?
$50m Dark Web Market Just Disappeared With Millions In Bitcoin
John Paulson's Gold Bet Loses Almost $1 Billion In Rout: Chart of Day
Pentagon considers arming Syrian rebels again
Alleged Silk Road Creator's Lawyer Defended Gitmo Detainee, NSA Target
Proposal to split California into three states makes November ballot
37 people arrested protesting drones (2011)
220 marijuana cases dismissed in King, Pierce counties after legalization
Jordan lawmaker fires Kalashnikov assault rifle at colleague
Japan: Fukushima clean-up will cost $58 billion
Wrongly imprisoned former Tulsan cleared by DNA sues city
U.S. Banks Bigger Than GDP as Accounting Rift Masks Risk
Detroit Billionaires Get Arena Help as Bankrupt City Suffers
Protest over Taiwanese military conscript’s death draws 100,000