“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
Globetrotting St. Louis pot entrepreneur sentenced to 15 years in prison
India central bank lifts ban on import of gold coins, medallions by banks
Winston Churchill’s shocking use of chemical weapons
Armed cops storm house after owner posts picture of TOY weapon on Facebook
Cop's victim gets $795K after sexual assault in back seat of police car
Phoenix Police Officer Is Sunk By Own Cam
French doctors stand trial for covering up deadly radiation overdoses
Bitcoin reshaping future of money
76% of Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck
'I've been priced out of downtown Detroit'
Luxembourg and USA sign FATCA Model 1 IGA
I was a Saudi arms dealer’s ‘pleasure wife’
Chinese Investors Snap Up Burgundy Vineyard As Thirst For French Wine Grows
As Egyptians Ignore Curfew, Talk of a U.S.-Brotherhood Conspiracy
Riveting and Chilling: Victims of IRS Targeting Tell Their Stories on Capitol Hill