“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
Legal Marijuana Faces Another Federal Hurdle: Taxes
NSA: 'We can’t stop our systems from deleting data wanted for lawsuit'
Photo of snoozing police officer in America’s most dangerous city enrages public
India gives top security protection to country’s richest man Mukesh Ambani
How German fears of underwriting Russian oligarchs pushed Cyprus to crisis
Ex-Hillsboro cop surrenders after shootout with police with wife, daughter at his side
After the whistle: Revealers of government secrets share how their lives have changed
Researchers demand sealed files about JFK assassination be made public
Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan.
NSA promises transparency by launching new Tumblr blog
US citing security to censor more public records
Japan’s economic minister wants Nikkei to surge 17% to 13,000 by March
Torture of prisoners persists in Afghanistan: UN
Why Puerto Rico's Attractive as a Tax Haven
Inside Hermès: Luxury's Secret Empire
