“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
(Visited 35 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
How The Hungarian Disease Is Spreading Across Central Europe
Audit finds NSA violated ‘thousands’ of its own privacy rules
Hillary Clinton backs Obama on Syria strike
Simple vinegar test can prevent cervical cancer deaths
Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange closes its doors; investors compensated in cash
Why Buffalo wings will break your budget in 2013
European Parliament Calls For Excluding Russia From SWIFT System
ICE abducts 146 workers in raid on Ohio meat facility
US sets up new military base in Syria, warns Assad not to attack it
‘Hell to pay:’ Residents angry as RCMP seize guns from High River homes
C.I.A. Collecting Data on International Money Transfers, Officials Say
China Backs US Startup Coinbase And US Falls Behind In Virtual Currencies
Greek Banks See Quadrupling of Housing Loans by Next Year
Russia moves to make failure to declare dual citizenship a crime
China to create $19B fund to support plunging stock market