“The United States judicial system is ostensibly built on laws and hard facts. But new research lends weight to the trope that ‘justice is what the judge ate for breakfast.’ A judge’s willingness to grant a prisoner parole wanes with time after a lunch or snack break, according to an observational study. Researchers from Columbia University and Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel analyzed more than 1,000 parole decisions made during 50 days by eight experienced judges in Israel. The proportion of favorable rulings fell from about 65 percent to nearly zero during each session separated by the two food breaks, leaping back to 65 percent immediately after the breaks.”
Related posts:
Australian Regulators Stand By as Global Mortgage Debt Drives Up Prices
U.S. eyes high-tech security boost at Canadian border
NYPD Police Sergeant Calls For Crackdown On Social Media Dissent
G20 vows to combat corporate tax avoidance
Two years after Mubarak, his prison torture apparatus still wounds Egypt
Now TSA agents are testing drinks purchased INSIDE the airport
Bitcoin and Poker: Zynga's Best Friends
USDA skeptical of Monsanto sabotage claim in ‘zombie wheat’ probe
Greece Seeks Taxes From Investors in London Property
Smackdown: Glenn Greenwald versus Mika Brzezinski
Talks underway to unionize Volkswagen’s U.S. plant
Saving Europe's banks: EU gets landmark deal
GCHQ intercepted foreign politicians' communications at G20 summits
North Carolina law prohibits police from destroying guns after buyback
Is Trump Going to Lie Our Way Into War With Iran?
