
“The South Dakota state House passed a bill that would ban both red-light cameras and speeding cameras by a whopping 69-1 margin. A Missouri state House panel on Monday heard testimony on a similar bill. A measure has been proposed in Iowa to require cities to justify their need for photo enforcement cameras, and a 2013 bill to ban them outright is still pending in Ohio. Opponents of the red-light cameras span the partisan divide, complaining of invasions of privacy or back-door tax increases — even that the red-light cameras result in more fender-benders at intersections. In some states, the ACLU is a prime driver behind camera-banning legislation; in others, it’s the tea party.”
Related posts:
British Somalis dread ban of ‘herbal high’ khat
Welcome, baseball fan. Go directly to jail.
Cop suspended for sex with teen, hosting underage drinking parties
Mister Taxman: Why Some Americans Working Abroad are Ditching Their Citizenships
New York auction houses celebrate after billion-dollar sales week
Woman to pay $9,250 per song in file-sharing case
Arrests in Vanuatu over dubious citizenship approvals
Icelanders Protest in Their Thousands as Parliament Sealed Off
The Ghosts of Baha Mar: How a $3.5 Billion Paradise Went Bust
U.S., French tax laws cause concern for expats of Switzerland
Millions of U.S. license plates tracked and stored – and it’s not just government agencies
How Wall Street Lawyer Turned Insider Trader Eluded FBI
Venezuela Seeks Buyer for Citgo Petroleum Refinery Unit
Spain refuses to extradite Swiss bank data 'thief'
Cuba looks to medical tourism to entice international visitors