
“The South Dakota state House passed a bill that would ban both red-light cameras and speeding cameras by a whopping 69-1 margin. A Missouri state House panel on Monday heard testimony on a similar bill. A measure has been proposed in Iowa to require cities to justify their need for photo enforcement cameras, and a 2013 bill to ban them outright is still pending in Ohio. Opponents of the red-light cameras span the partisan divide, complaining of invasions of privacy or back-door tax increases — even that the red-light cameras result in more fender-benders at intersections. In some states, the ACLU is a prime driver behind camera-banning legislation; in others, it’s the tea party.”
Related posts:
Spain To Ban Photos of Police on Duty
Atlantic Council, Bitcoin: The Future of Currency?
Mexico says marijuana legalization in U.S. could change anti-drug strategies
Winklevoss twins: Bitcoins better than gold
Student shot in head by cop while being used as human shield during home invasion
Actor Gerard Depardieu ‘giving up French passport’ in tax controversy
Kim Dotcom poised for return with Megaupload successor
Farm subsidies on the rise in the world’s biggest economies
Term limits for Congressional ethics investigators removed
Termites Feast On Woman's Life Savings
China's Dollar Trap: Foreign Exchange Reserves Hit $3.8tn
Dozens of British universities join the online education revolution
Spaniards Fight to Get $10.3 Billion In Savings Back From Bank Investment Schemes
77,000 Foreign Banks To Share Account Info With IRS
Obama will address country on Syria; calls crisis ‘threat to global peace’