
“These forfeitures and the partnerships between municipal police and federal agencies rose as the economy of California slid into a slump. Forfeitures through the federal Equitable Sharing Program have tripled while forfeitures using the state’s process have remained flat (and much lower). The reason is pretty simple: California’s asset forfeiture law allows law enforcement agencies to keep only a maximum of 65 percent of the money they seize. The federal program allows law enforcement agencies to keep 80 percent. Some cities appear to be anticipating forfeiture revenue in advance and using forfeited funds to supplant budgeted spending for law enforcement agencies.”
http://reason.com/blog/2015/04/21/tiny-california-towns-have-big-asset-for
Related posts:
Europe ensures second-class experience for Web users as GDPR takes effect
How Immigration Crackdowns Screw Up Americans' Lives
Using a Gun to Save a Child’s Life in DC Will Get You a $1,000 Fine
Stefan Molyneux, Bitcoin: The Psychology of Money
Bank of America supplied answers on ‘independent’ foreclosure review
Women Win Lawsuit After Being Violated During Roadside Search
MyRA: "A Start To A Secure Retirement", Promises Treasury Secretary
Belgian MP LAURENT LOUIS stands against war in Mali and exposes the international neo-colonial plot
Congress resumes attacks on emigrants: the Ex-PATRIOT Act is back
End the Empire
Bank Of Korea Delivers The Latest Surprise Interest Rate Cut This Week
Blackwater Founder Erik Prince: War on Terror Has Become Too Big
Forget the Cellphone Fight — We Should Be Allowed to Unlock Everything We Own
Iranians shun own currency for Gold
Audio catches cops shouting ‘Burn this motherf*cker!’ during Dorner siege