
“Methods included the dissemination of misinformation or propaganda, training one side in campaigning techniques, making threats against a particular candidate, threatening to withdraw foreign aid, and bank-rolling a particular candidate among others. In 59% of the cases examined, the candidate that had received US ‘assistance’ emerged victorious, though Levin estimated that the average effect of ‘partisan electoral interventions’ only swayed the vote by an average of 3%.”
Related posts:
Government hospitals removing wrong reproductive parts becomes a trend
Justin Raimondo: Snowden a Hero to Americans
PayPal Cuts Off VPN Provider iPredator, Freezes Assets
Texas Town Charging Reporters $79,000 for Emails About Cop Abuse
Datapp Sniffs Out Unencrypted Mobile Data
Peak Cantillon Effect: Swiss National Bank Prints Its Way To Prosperity
Jim Rogers shares insights on his book Street Smarts
When A Sociopath Prattles to Psychopaths
Investigative journalist Ben Swann weighs in on push to Syria war
Jim Rogers Exclusive Interview: QE, currency wars, inflation and gold
Google Challenges FISA Gag Orders on Free Speech Grounds
Private Schools in India Serve the Poor, but Can They Survive Attacks by Government?
Lonely Jeremiahs
10,000 Linux servers hit by malware serving spam and exploits
Feds Arrest Alleged Top Silk Road Drug Seller; Copycat Sites 'Key Priority'