
“Methods included the dissemination of misinformation or propaganda, training one side in campaigning techniques, making threats against a particular candidate, threatening to withdraw foreign aid, and bank-rolling a particular candidate among others. In 59% of the cases examined, the candidate that had received US ‘assistance’ emerged victorious, though Levin estimated that the average effect of ‘partisan electoral interventions’ only swayed the vote by an average of 3%.”
Related posts:
Bitcoin Bootcamp - Hakim Mamoni
Massive surge in Litecoin mining leads to graphics card shortage
Cryptocurrency 'Ripple' Pursues Freezing Funds of Former Co-Founder
Georgia Police Kill Diabetic After Family Calls 911 Requesting Ambulance
Veteran’s Guns Confiscated After Forced ‘Psychiatric Evaluation’
Alydian targets big ticket miners with Terahash hosting
Republicans to declare ‘We Built This!’ in stadium built with government funds
US Government Spends Millions Building Roads Overseas
Residency in Puerto Rico as an Alternative to Expatriation
On the Ground in Cyprus with Doug Casey
Warrantless cellphone location tracking is illegal, US circuit court rules
Sacramento Kings NBA Franchise Launches Bitcoin-Only Online Store
With Italy's Election, the EU Chasm Grows
Don't Privatize the Afghan War—Just End It
Here’s One Fight Uncle Sam Can’t Win