
“It may seem unnerving that information contained inside the body — as opposed to kept in the home or worn on the wrist — could be used in a criminal investigation. But courts have yet to distinguish between data interior to the body and data stored on the outside. Data isn’t considered more protected or more private by virtue of its personal nature or where it is stored.”
Read more: https://www.wired.com/story/your-own-pacemaker-can-now-testify-against-you-in-court/
Related posts:
Judge rules TX school district can make students wear locator chips
America Is Setting A Dangerous Precedent For The Drone Age
Kerry to Putin: 'Don't invade a country on completely phony pretexts'
Tracking School Children With RFID Tags? It’s All About the Benjamins
Newly Printed Bernanke Money Floods Manhattan
State Dept. admits passport form was illegal, but still wants it approved
Texas Supreme Court reinstates judge who beat disabled daughter
Marijuana: The Next Diabetes Drug?
Peter Schiff: Symptoms Don't Lie
Investing: 'When things go on sale, people run out of the store'
5 Amazing, Cheap Places to Live as an Expat
Bank run starts in Ukraine; Long Queues to Withdraw Cash
MIT Students Show the Enormously Intrusive Nature of Metadata
Four Louisiana Cops Choked Young Man To Death In Low-Level Drug Bust
Supreme Court: Cops can’t hold suspects to wait for drug-sniffing dog