
“The OLC argues that the presidential order, issued without authorization by or consultation with Congress, was nevertheless lawful because the president ‘had reasonably determined that the use of force would be in the national interest and that the anticipated hostilities would not rise to the level of a war in the constitutional sense.'”
Related posts:
12 Days of Bitcoin: The High Risk IRA
New report: In tough times, police property seizures rise
Richest 400 Americans get richer
Trade war bailout: $12 billion in emergency aid for farmers hurt by tariffs
Florida woman arrested for riding an endangered manatee
Pot vaporizer boom leads to secret stoners
Early Champions Of Bitcoin Reap Unexpected Windfall
Did cops need to kill a 95-year-old veteran with a Taser, riot shield and shotgun?
Obama executive order expands Homeland Security reach into local law enforcement
Former police chief gets probation for multiple drug charges
Senators in Immigration Talks Mull Federal IDs for All Workers
Tesla Motors now more valuable than Italian auto giant Fiat
Why Gordon Brown sold Britain's gold at a knock-down price [2012]
Amid crackdown, China requires Party building in social groups’ charters
U.S. warns Egypt of return to ‘bad old days’ of Mubarak