“The OLC argues that the presidential order, issued without authorization by or consultation with Congress, was nevertheless lawful because the president ‘had reasonably determined that the use of force would be in the national interest and that the anticipated hostilities would not rise to the level of a war in the constitutional sense.'”
Related posts:
Russia and Greece to ink Turkish Stream gas pipeline deal
Famous 'Fantasy Island' plane used to smuggle drugs into Oklahoma
Prosecutors aren't obligated to believe the evidence they present at trial
NSA admits: Our analysts ‘willfully violated’ rules of surveillance system
Judge Napolitano Slams Gen. Alexander Not Answering Question in NSA Hearing: TRUST US?
Body cam shows dad had hands up when cops killed his 6-year-old son
Ex-cop accused of groping women gets two-year sentence
Federal Europe will be 'a reality in a few years', says commission president
DHS ‘fusion centers’ portrayed as pools of ineptitude, civil liberties intrusions
Jury rules cops were justified in SWAT raid over family's loose-leaf tea
WikiHouse allows people to build their own homes with 3-D printers
Champlin couple get $90,000 after police steal shoes off their porch
Ford files patent for an autonomous police car that can ticket you
Australian Train Drivers, Paid Like U.S. Surgeons, Replaced With Robots
Colorado theater shooting victims’ families condemn organizers over relief fund