“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
(Visited 30 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Moms in Spain Strip to Raise Money for School Bus
China bubble in 'danger zone' warns Bank of Japan
Chinese Bitcoin crackdown sparks revenge cyber-attack
Google wants to build the Star Trek computer
Romney rakes in $170 million for September; Obama $181 million
Deportations of illegal immigrants in 2012 reach new US record
U.S. Household Income Sinks to '95 Level
Global mercury ban would not affect vaccines with thimerosal
Doubt Grows in Reforms of Rajoy Government in Spain
Central Bank Injects Cash After China Money Rates Jump to Records
Peru dethrones Colombia as cocaine king
Mexican vigilantes seize town, arrest police
Russian Bear stops Finland leaving euro?
Judge: Merchants owed millions in credit card fees ‘inappropriately’ inflated by Fed
The heavy hand of the IRS seizes innocent Americans’ assets