“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
Pentagon in 2012: 75,000 troops needed to secure Syria chemical weapons
Hurricane Sandy: Local residents banned from barrier island up to 8 months
Feds subjected New Mexico woman to vaginal, anal drug search
N.Y. Fed: Ample liquidity in U.S. corporate bond market
Criminal defense lawyers demand access to secret DEA evidence
BOND New York Real Estate Will Accept Bitcoins as Payment
Obamacare To Increase Individual-Market Premiums By Average Of 41%
Russia's first gold exchange-traded fund lists on Moscow bourse
PayPal unfreezes $45,000 cancer donation after media investigation
India central bank introduces more policies to curb gold imports
Tests Show 0.00% BAC, Retired Firefighter Arrested For DUI & Car Impounded Anyway
Milwaukee Police Officer Richard Schoen punches woman, fired and then re-hired
Warren Buffett plans $2 billion a year Australian spending spree
Romney Fears Ron Paul Forces at GOP Convention; Wants to be Nominated Early
Jim Rogers on Bloomberg Radio Oct 16, 2012