
“The government argues that CMPs are needed to prevent courtroom disclosure of sensitive evidence from causing damage to the so-called ‘control principle’ governing intelligence shared between states. Secret evidence, which is already used in terrorism-related immigration tribunals, allows government lawyers to rely on evidence that cannot be seen by victims or claimants, or their lawyers. The evidence can be seen by security-vetted barristers known as special advocates, but they cannot discuss what they have seen. The system is widely regarded as inherently unfair and would inevitably lead to legal challenges.”
Related posts:
Snooping Fears: German Firms Race to Shield Secrets
Virtual currencies being undermined by rising criminality: McAfee firm
FBI repeatedly overstated encryption threat figures to Congress, public
Treasury Gets a Citibanker
Ex-Port Authority Official Says Christie Knew About Lane Closings
Military Presentation Labels Evangelicals, Catholics as ‘Religious Extremism’
Indonesia Upholds Death Sentence For British Grandmother's Drug Smuggling
Needy EU Nations Woo Chinese Home Buyers to Ease Slump
When the Government Went After Dr. Spock
Proposal to split California into three states makes November ballot
New Zealand police ordered to return Dotcom material
Army sexual assault prevention officer arrested for stalking ex-wife
Overstock CEO: money ’too important to leave to government officials’
France: The new sick man of Europe?
Fed Accused Of Sending Nude Selfie To Woman Who Needed Help