“The 2010 discovery of the Stuxnet cyberweapon, which used a thumb drive to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and spread among its computers, illustrated how one type of attack could work. Most at risk are paperless e-voting machines, which don’t print out any record of votes, meaning the electronically stored results could be altered without anyone knowing they had been changed. In a tight election, the result could be the difference between winning and losing. A Monitor analysis shows that four swing states – Pennsylvania, Virginia, Colorado, and Florida – rely to varying degrees on paperless machines.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
'Copblock' wiretap case goes to court in Manchester
State representative raised $1,600 for his campaign — in bitcoins
Russian Bear stops Finland leaving euro?
Left In The Dark: Copper Thieves Rob Detroit Freeways Of Light
The Saudi Town on the Frontline of Yemen's War
Retired EPA attorney leads the opposition to 'smart meters' in Maryland
We’re in a worse position than in 2008: Marc Faber
Cliven Bundy will be held accountable, Interior secretary says
A look inside the federal civil forfeiture process
Drones patrolling U.S. borders spark controversy over privacy
Dubai offers gold to fight obesity epidemic
FDA May Have Age Restrictions On Cups Of Coffee
ACLU: Border Patrol Routinely Violates Citizens' Rights At Checkpoints
Polish PM laments opinion impasse keeping Poland out of Eurozone
Too much gold around the house? Store it at Texas' new precious metals depository