“The 2010 discovery of the Stuxnet cyberweapon, which used a thumb drive to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and spread among its computers, illustrated how one type of attack could work. Most at risk are paperless e-voting machines, which don’t print out any record of votes, meaning the electronically stored results could be altered without anyone knowing they had been changed. In a tight election, the result could be the difference between winning and losing. A Monitor analysis shows that four swing states – Pennsylvania, Virginia, Colorado, and Florida – rely to varying degrees on paperless machines.”
Related posts:
Police Now Using Facial Recognition With Driver License Databases In 31 States
IRS secretly used DEA surveillance database to launch investigations
US Army vet charged with fighting alongside al-Qaida against Syrian government
China to create $19B fund to support plunging stock market
Act Signed By Obama Restricting Westboro Military Funeral Protests
Colorado Democrats fail to stave off recall efforts after supporting gun control
High school students suspended for possession of energy mints
Texas cops drag young, weeping jogger away in cuffs for jaywalking
Prison time for former cop trafficking in steroids
Official: Cannes diamond heist actually nets $136M
CFR Head Richard Haass: U.S. is going to take military action against Syria
Interview with Chris Kalbaugh, Producer of 4th of July DUI Checkpoint Video
Creator of PGP explains why he moved his company to Switzerland
Will Overstock Force IRS To Make Up Its Mind About Bitcoin?
Keurig Founder Loses $144M In Minutes As Shares Crash