“Well, in very targeted strikes, we use very targeted strikes against al Qaeda. And so if it is a very targeted strike, many would argue that that’s short of war. And if it only seeks to go after their nuclear program, that is — we’re not talking about invasions or naval engagements or troops on the ground, none of that. And this has been used by other — President Clinton used this tactic. [..] And we do know, those — that the Iranians believe that there is a whole panoply of options — war and then these targeted strikes they don’t see as — wouldn’t see as an act of war.”
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/24/1081181/rogers-iran-attack-act-of-war/
Related posts:
Murray Sabrin: Cuba, part two, the economy
Carnage in Syria Courtesy of US Allies
Florida bill designed to fight gambling scandal could cost state thousands of jobs
Torture Memo Author John Yoo: President Can Wage War Without Declaration
World’s First Payroll Software to Pay in Bitcoins
Bitcoin vs. The Fed: Andreas Antonopoulos, Stefan Molyneux
Texas Supreme Court reinstates judge who beat disabled daughter
Austrian Steelmaker Offshores Production To ... Texas
$90 million spent on now-abandoned Maryland Obamacare exchange
What The 25% Collapse In Homebuilder Stock Prices Tells Us
Forget Too Big to Fail Banks — It's Time to Break Up the Fed
Jim Rogers: Why I’m shorting India
Leaked Cable Confirms Israeli-Saudi Coordination To Provoke War
US 'Secret' Drone Base and Ron Paul's Foreign Policy
(Surveillance) Times have Changed
