“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Related posts:
Hershey, Cuba
The Only Truly Compliant, Submissive Citizen Is a Dead One
Cage Complex: Why is America’s prison population soaring?
Bitcoin: Internationalization's New Best Friend
"For Your Own Protection"
The End of Private Property in the Era of the American Police State
Indian central bank has debased the rupee 99% vs the dollar; no hope in next Guv too
The Ultimate Cheat Sheet For Starting And Running A Business
Petting & Walking With Cheetahs in Africa at Mukuni Big 5 Safaris
The risk of taking on Syria
Bill Bonner: Middle Class? What Middle Class?
Desert Storm Anniversary Reminds Us That Even Victorious Wars Are Problematic
Will Grigg: The Stalinist in the White House
In France's Welfare State Status Quo, Are We Seeing America's Future?
How to offshore your credit card with China’s Unionpay