“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Related posts:
It Won't Stay in Vegas: The Metro PD's Homeland Security Theater
The Grand Experiment: Offloading Risk onto the State
Let Him Without a Plank in His Own Eye Cast the First Stone
Who Really Started the Korean War?
Vote Harder: The Barack Obama Story
Internationalizing in Chile
Debt Excess and the Liquidation Process in a Historical Context
Why Foreign Real Estate is an Internationalization Grand Slam
The Throwaways: Pawns in the War on Drugs
Three major fault lines in Syria! Will they explode?
Why the Doctor Can’t See You
Why Libertarianism Will Crush Conservatism
America's Social Recession: Five Years and Counting
Paul Craig Roberts: 2014 Will Bring More Social Collapse
Will Grigg: Put Not Your Trust In Federalized Sheriffs