“Anyone who challenges the authority of the state (and thus the money power that stands behind it and controls it) is at risk for being labeled a terrorist. This explains why US prosecutors can label von NotHaus a terrorist. The term is merely a convenient nomenclature. It has been purposefully ‘evolved’ so that an extracurricular judicial system can be brought into effect. Simply by redefining definitions over time − and manufacturing events to buttress the terminology − the elites have been able to bring into being a new class of felon (the terrorist) and a new and oppressive judicial system, as well. The purpose is intimidation.”
http://www.thedailybell.com/28240/Anthony-Wile-The-Dilemma-of-False-Terrorism
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
What's Up with Inflation?
Doug Casey on Opting-Out
The Trick is to Suspend the Constitution Without Admitting It
You’re Not That Important
The real story behind the demise of America's once-mighty streetcars
Paul Craig Roberts: Why War Is Inevitable
Who Owns Congress? The NSA or the FED?
Sending Money Home: Technology or Bureaucracy?
Coinsetter CEO’s Message to Banks: You Will Soon Love Bitcoin
On the Rio Grande, Commerce Survives by the Honor System
Wait Long, Move Fast
Michael Scheuer: On Syria, Our interventionists ensure America’s luck is running out
Humans Need Not Apply
CFR Reports on Deadly Viruses That Become the Property of Sovereign Nations
I'm Astounded by This Terrorism Statute