“What seems to be pretty much a given is that the DEA will not go after consumers. They simply don’t have the staff to do it. 99% of possession arrests are by state and local police — if they’re not doing it under the new law, then the feds can’t do much about it. So, as with medical marijuana, they’ll go after the big suppliers. That’s almost impossible to defend against — the government’s ability to seize property and the visibility of large suppliers makes it easy picking. So the smart thing would be to push for a lot of small suppliers — make it hard for the DEA to go after them and less of a loss if they do.”
Related posts:
Marc Faber on ET Now Sept 03, 2012
Chauvinists and Other Anti-Peace Voices
Jeffrey Tucker: The War Is On You
U.S., Europe Still Funding Egypt Military Oppression With Billions
Government Should Stop Its Own Violence First
The Dictatorial Power to Punish a Dictator
Almost Every Passenger on Indian Flight Found Carrying 1kg of Gold
3 Reasons Not to Go to War with Syria
Sitka Pacific Capital Management Client Letter, May 2013
The Republican Platform and the Mainstreaming of the Gold Standard
Trump and the Deep State: Is Everyone Getting It Wrong?
Bill Bonner: This Unexpected Event Will Cut the S&P 500 in Half
Housing, Diminishing Returns and Opportunity Cost
The Secret to Picking Winners in ‘Submerging Markets’
Google $22.5 Million FTC Fine Has No Teeth