“What could be so bad and threatening that a ‘national hero’ like General David Petraeus would admit to the horribly embarrassing and personal extra-marital affair just to divert attention and thus exit the game relatively intact? (Sometimes admitting to something terribly personal can provide a kind of vaccine against further probes). Seems right-wingers feel it is a way to avoid having to testify over CIA failures in Benghazi in September. Possible. I wonder whether that horse is indeed cold after Republican beatings. And I am a bit skeptical that Benghazi was anything resembling what it was portrayed.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/125930.html
(Visited 48 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Bombing Syria: Little Gain but Much Cost and Risk
Who Should Decide What You Eat?
Bill Bonner: Is Ms Yellen making history?
German Study: Tax Competition and Fiscal Decentralization Limit Income Redistribution
Naomi Wolf: My creeping concern that the NSA leaker is not who he purports to be
Threat from China Is Being Hyped
Fed Money Pumping Brings Results: The Affluent Society Returns
3 Reasons Not to Go to War with Syria
Syria supports Kurdish self-rule vote that US labels 'illegitimate'
Bill Bonner: The Fed Can’t Stop What’s Coming
Bill Bonner: Empire of Debt
Lance Armstrong and Kim Dotcom ... Guilty Until Proven Innocent?
The Lie of Moral Mercantilism
Bill Bonner: Are We Approaching a “Second Coming” For Gold?
Nine Reasons Why Bombing Syria Is Not an Act of Justice