“The way we’re encouraged to cope with this is to make it about privacy: to turn inwards, take stock of our personal inner domain, and decide just how much of our lives can be offered up to the state. Large scale, bureaucratic intrusion into our personal lives is a given, but we can fill out a customer response card if we have any comments about the degree of the intrusion. If this is about privacy, the onus is on us to define its limits, to guide our servant institutions to the right policies that will protect our newly cordoned-off personal space. And so they invent a clever distraction about what the limits of privacy should be.”
Related posts:
The $4 Trillion Money Printing Press
The Overworked and the Idle
Cyprus and the Unraveling of Fractional-Reserve Banking
David Galland: Chains of Convention
Cannabis: History, Legalization, Regulation, & the Public Health Model
The Fourth Branch: The Rise to Power of the National Security State
Secrets and Lies of the Bailout
America's Energy Boom and the Rising U.S. Dollar
The Top of the Pyramid
Americans Are War Weary ... And The Neocons Don't Like It
Bill Bonner: Jailhouse humour
“Cruel and Unusual” Is the Only Way to Describe It
The All-Seeing Eye
Charles A. Burris: War Crimes, the Holocaust, and Today’s National Security State
5 Issues That Prove Ron Paul is Ahead of His Time