“The way we’re encouraged to cope with this is to make it about privacy: to turn inwards, take stock of our personal inner domain, and decide just how much of our lives can be offered up to the state. Large scale, bureaucratic intrusion into our personal lives is a given, but we can fill out a customer response card if we have any comments about the degree of the intrusion. If this is about privacy, the onus is on us to define its limits, to guide our servant institutions to the right policies that will protect our newly cordoned-off personal space. And so they invent a clever distraction about what the limits of privacy should be.”
Related posts:
FDR Spied on Leonard Read
Gold and Syria
CEO: Tech companies should not permit governments to use face recognition
The Road to the Permanent Warfare State, Part 12 - Gregory Bresiger
10 Geniuses Who Used Drugs -- And Their Drugs of Choice
Libertarian Perspective on Switzerland
Michael Hastings' Final Article Before Car Explosion: 'Why Democrats Love To Spy On Americans'
Charles Burris: American Statolatry
Everything Created Digitally Is Nearly Free--Including Money
Doug Casey on Internationalizing Your Cash
If Edward Snowden Had Read This Book …
Swiss Freeports and the Invincible Tax Evader
Detlev Schlichter: Some personal thoughts on surviving the monetary meltdown
Jacob Hornberger: Dismantle the International Checkpoints
Downside Resilience, Anyone?
