“The way we’re encouraged to cope with this is to make it about privacy: to turn inwards, take stock of our personal inner domain, and decide just how much of our lives can be offered up to the state. Large scale, bureaucratic intrusion into our personal lives is a given, but we can fill out a customer response card if we have any comments about the degree of the intrusion. If this is about privacy, the onus is on us to define its limits, to guide our servant institutions to the right policies that will protect our newly cordoned-off personal space. And so they invent a clever distraction about what the limits of privacy should be.”
Related posts:
John Hussman: A Warning from Graham and Dodd
Cuba's Past Could Be Your Future
How has this not led to outright revolution yet?
Anthony Gregory: The Habeas Corpus Myth
BusinessWeek: The Death of Equities [1979]
The Cyprus Depositor Haircut
CTRAFFIK -"What if Nobody Showed Up to Vote?" (Official Video)
We’re All Criminals and Outlaws in the Eyes of the American Police State
A Guide To Understanding the Middle East, Syria, The West and Oil
The Fiscal Cliff's Structural Endgame
Iraq’s pain has only intensified since 2003
The Overcriminalization of America: Are We All Criminals Now?
No More "Free Trade" Treaties: It's Time for Genuine Free Trade
Cannabis: History, Legalization, Regulation, & the Public Health Model
Anti-gun cities, where the rich pay for protection while the poor pay with their lives
