“The way we’re encouraged to cope with this is to make it about privacy: to turn inwards, take stock of our personal inner domain, and decide just how much of our lives can be offered up to the state. Large scale, bureaucratic intrusion into our personal lives is a given, but we can fill out a customer response card if we have any comments about the degree of the intrusion. If this is about privacy, the onus is on us to define its limits, to guide our servant institutions to the right policies that will protect our newly cordoned-off personal space. And so they invent a clever distraction about what the limits of privacy should be.”
Related posts:
Is College A Scam?
The State: Crown Jewel of Human Social Organization
Seasteading: Striking at the Root of Bad Government
My History With the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC)
Our American Dream Has Become The World's Nightmare.
Five Reasons Washington Should Leave Bitcoin Alone
Police Are More Dangerous To The Public Than Are Criminals
Ron Paul: Gold is Good Money
The Permanent Overclass's Propaganda System: A Century In The Making
The Ecuadorian Library: or, The Blast Shack After Three Years
Ron Paul: After 100 Years Of Failure, It's Time To End The Fed
The Politics of Fear in America: A Nation at War with Itself
Iraq’s pain has only intensified since 2003
A Shoe Tariff With a Big Footprint
Easy Test to Separate Winners from Wasters
