“White House aides meanwhile shied away from the question of whether Iraq was better off, 10 years after the United States launched an invasion on the grounds of eradicating weapons of mass destruction which were never found. ‘I think historians have to make the judgment,’ White House spokesman Jay Carney said. ‘I think that ridding the world of Saddam Hussein was a welcome development for the world and for Iraq, but again, the president opposed the policy, as candidate, of invading Iraq and as a candidate for president as well.’ US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel acknowledged the huge human toll the conflict had taken on the Iraqi people.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Attorney General & DOJ to Investigate Officer in Beating Video
NYT: 'Close the N.S.A.’s Back Doors'
How Hillary Clinton plans to ‘save capitalism’
Miner to Pay in Bitcoins for Work at Tungsten Project
Citic Securities: Interest in Chinese REITs High
India state moves to ban black magic after anti-superstition activist gunned down
American Expat Taxpayers Would Rather Ditch Citizenship Than Face New IRS Rules
Meet 'Bitcoin Jesus,' a virtual currency millionaire
An assault on living standards set to run and run
Federal "Compassion" at work: Sandy Victims Imprisoned in FEMA Camps
US calls Assange 'enemy of state'
30,000 California inmates launch hunger strike against ‘state-sanctioned torture’
How the Vatican built a secret property empire using Mussolini's millions
Cypriot president 'warned his friends to move money abroad' before financial crisis hit
Ford's Trade-In: Truck to Use Aluminum in Place of Steel