
“White House aides meanwhile shied away from the question of whether Iraq was better off, 10 years after the United States launched an invasion on the grounds of eradicating weapons of mass destruction which were never found. ‘I think historians have to make the judgment,’ White House spokesman Jay Carney said. ‘I think that ridding the world of Saddam Hussein was a welcome development for the world and for Iraq, but again, the president opposed the policy, as candidate, of invading Iraq and as a candidate for president as well.’ US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel acknowledged the huge human toll the conflict had taken on the Iraqi people.”
Related posts:
On 'Intellectual Property' and Pot
Owner wins court battle against feds trying to seize his Tewksbury motel
Chilean farmers export pet tarantulas around the world
Swiss Offshore-Adviser's Guilty Plea Marks a Shift in Tax Crackdown
Golden threads for the undie drawers of the wealthy
Entrepreneurs increasingly accepting 'bitcoins' in India
Australian Train Drivers, Paid Like U.S. Surgeons, Replaced With Robots
Starting an online store in Greece is no easy business
ACLU takes CIA to court over drone strikes
Former NSA exec: The goal of the NSA is total population control
Contagion Spreads in Emerging Markets as Crises Grow
Google blocks video after losing Brazil court battle
Iceland EU accession talks break down over mackerel quotas
New European ruling game-changing for U.S. companies
Paris retailers complain street crime is chasing off cash-flush Chinese tourists