“White House aides meanwhile shied away from the question of whether Iraq was better off, 10 years after the United States launched an invasion on the grounds of eradicating weapons of mass destruction which were never found. ‘I think historians have to make the judgment,’ White House spokesman Jay Carney said. ‘I think that ridding the world of Saddam Hussein was a welcome development for the world and for Iraq, but again, the president opposed the policy, as candidate, of invading Iraq and as a candidate for president as well.’ US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel acknowledged the huge human toll the conflict had taken on the Iraqi people.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Econ 101 for Panama: New Price Controls Bring Rampant Shortages
Bitcoin Targets Payments Business of Giants Visa to JPMorgan
Draft Senate resolution allows Obama 90 days for Syria military campaign
FDA May Have Age Restrictions On Cups Of Coffee
French minister in charge of combating tax avoidance resigns over Swiss bank account
Don’t laugh - Bitcoin is making a serious point
Well-to-do get mortgage help from Uncle Sam
Taxpayers funding study of link between marijuana, domestic violence
French competition watchdog raids Apple stores
Regulator Says British Bank Helped Iran Hide Deals
Say hello to intelligent pills
The War On Terror Has Cost Taxpayers $1.7 Trillion
US breaks up phone scam where fake government agents believably extorted victims
The £240million private jet with a Turkish bath, boardroom and concert hall
Cash-strapped Cyprus plots Russian exit from austerity