“If the U.S. unilaterally bombs Syria, it can’t possibly be an act of neutral justice in response to a chemical attack. Why not? Several reasons. (1) The U.S. has supported anti-Assad (anti-Syrian) rebel forces against Assad for several years. (2) The U.S. has not been a neutral presence in that region since 1919. [..] (3) The U.S. has selected immediate violence as a response without taking the time to pursue other remedies. (4) The U.S. is threatening to act on incomplete information. (5) The existing framework of international law doesn’t allow for unilateral bombing by the U.S. or any other state. (6) Any attack may kill and wound innocent Syrians. [..] ”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-not-an-act-of-justice/
(Visited 39 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
The Seeds of War Have Been Sown
Criminals do not need guns
Errant Code? It’s Not Just a Bug
QE3 – Pay Attention If You Are in the Real Estate Market
Trump Is Not the First U.S. Politician to Use Humvees and F-16s as Props
Tor and the Silk Road takedown
Jacob Hornberger: Tyranny and Gun Control in Venezuela
Sandy Hook Massacre: Sympathy from the Devil
TSA: Ask the Fed for Relief...From the Fed?
In a week's time, Trump threatens Iraq, Iran, and Mexico
George W. Bush doesn't deserve the media's efforts at rehabilitation
The Dead-Head Fed And “The Only Road to Riches”
Silver Set to Double, According to… Apple?
Don't Photoshop Obama
Trump and the Deep State: Is Everyone Getting It Wrong?