“If the U.S. unilaterally bombs Syria, it can’t possibly be an act of neutral justice in response to a chemical attack. Why not? Several reasons. (1) The U.S. has supported anti-Assad (anti-Syrian) rebel forces against Assad for several years. (2) The U.S. has not been a neutral presence in that region since 1919. [..] (3) The U.S. has selected immediate violence as a response without taking the time to pursue other remedies. (4) The U.S. is threatening to act on incomplete information. (5) The existing framework of international law doesn’t allow for unilateral bombing by the U.S. or any other state. (6) Any attack may kill and wound innocent Syrians. [..] ”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-not-an-act-of-justice/
Related posts:
Kafka’s America: Secret Courts, Secret Laws, and Total Surveillance
So, Sir Patrick Stewart Wants to Become a US Citizen?
Leaping to Conclusions
Confronting America the Torturer
Bitcoin is going mainstream. Here is why cypherpunks shouldn’t worry.
Democrats Demand Reinstatement of The Draft
A century bond? Just think what can happen in 100 years
Paul Craig Roberts: Amerika’s Future is Death
Are You Ready for This Coming Disaster?
Severe Disaffection: Seventy-five Percent of US Citizens Don't Trust Government
'King Would've Marched on Obama'
Bill Bonner: 'Uber Alles'
Officer Friendly is Dead
Ron Paul: Obama Has No Middle East Strategy? Good!
Justin Raimondo: The Iron Fist in Tampa
