“If the U.S. unilaterally bombs Syria, it can’t possibly be an act of neutral justice in response to a chemical attack. Why not? Several reasons. (1) The U.S. has supported anti-Assad (anti-Syrian) rebel forces against Assad for several years. (2) The U.S. has not been a neutral presence in that region since 1919. [..] (3) The U.S. has selected immediate violence as a response without taking the time to pursue other remedies. (4) The U.S. is threatening to act on incomplete information. (5) The existing framework of international law doesn’t allow for unilateral bombing by the U.S. or any other state. (6) Any attack may kill and wound innocent Syrians. [..] ”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-not-an-act-of-justice/
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Glenn Greenwald: Three key lessons from the Obama administration's drone lies
Benghazi: Who Cares?
Jacob Hornberger: Ditch the CIA, the Pentagon, and the NSA
Jim Rogers: Why Gold Broke Its Bull Run
"Protecting" the Public From Plants -- By Invading Their Homes
The Attack on U.S. Property Rights Continues
Is the U.S. the World’s Moral Authority as Obama Thinks?
Donald Trump Flaunts the Dangers of Presidential Power
Why “Tapering” Will Not Go Smoothly — and What That Means for Bonds and Stocks
Your Money Isn't Safe In Any U.S. Financial Institution
Marc Faber: What Happened In Cyprus Will Happen Everywhere
I apologize for what you’re about to read
Major Losses Expected for Pork Industry
Bill Bonner: How America’s Working Stiffs Got Stiffed
Free Speech Limits to Fight ISIS Pose a Greater Threat Than ISIS