“If the U.S. unilaterally bombs Syria, it can’t possibly be an act of neutral justice in response to a chemical attack. Why not? Several reasons. (1) The U.S. has supported anti-Assad (anti-Syrian) rebel forces against Assad for several years. (2) The U.S. has not been a neutral presence in that region since 1919. [..] (3) The U.S. has selected immediate violence as a response without taking the time to pursue other remedies. (4) The U.S. is threatening to act on incomplete information. (5) The existing framework of international law doesn’t allow for unilateral bombing by the U.S. or any other state. (6) Any attack may kill and wound innocent Syrians. [..] ”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/bombing-syria-is-not-an-act-of-justice/
(Visited 38 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
The UK – In Or Out Of The EU?
Sovereign Debt Pile-Up Spurs Wave Of Downgrades To Kick Off 2017
Bill Bonner: US Market Crash Alert!
The Real National Security Interest of America
Want a House? Be Rich and Pay Cash
They Think You’re Naïve…
Don’t Fall Victim to Hoarding
U.S. Now Bombing Assad Forces Openly In Syria
Glenn Greenwald: About the Reuters article
Ron Paul: Do We Need to Bring Back Internment Camps?
Transparent Hoax Could Lead to War
Rep. Cantor Steals Condi Rice’s Iraq Lines for Syria
Bradley Manning: The Mighty Fist!
My Answer To A VC's Bitcoin Question
Obama and Israel Stoke a Sectarian Shia-Sunni War